Contents

Talk:Common Criteria

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Common Criteria article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with: Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information... Answer question about Same-origin_policy Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here. Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

There a now bugs on this page, which I have may caused.

a) The edit-links are shifted, i.e., pressing the one one the level of Usage, brings up the edit page for history, on the history one for mutual recognition agreement

b) On error, I created an "In other languages" side bar. I corrected my mistake, but the error is still present

I reported both errors now in the BTS, so if you know the cause, add that information to the bug reports (#2587 and #2588)

There is a defined project on Common Criteria laboratory installation in Iran for the first time in middle east. Owner of project is Iran Telecommunication Research Center (ITRC). Project is being accomplished in Amirkabir University of Technology.

This section currently only decribes the US implementation. The section should be made more generic.

This page says that the common criteria is an ISO standard, and links to a web page containing the standard. There is no mention of the Common Criteria Development Board, etc., which can be found at http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org. In that web site the Common Criteria standard can be found, which in many cases is a word-for-word copy of the ISO standard, except one says Common Criteria and the other says ISO/IEC. What is the relationship between these two organizations? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.190.254.108 (talk) 23:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Currently (09-11-25) there is a link to the semantic web page. I am quite sure the two items do not have anything in common. CC is about security assurance and Semantic Web is basically about scraping information on Web sites.

I removed it, it had no bearing whatsoever. It was introduced on February 2008 in the version 189923010, by a guy who seem to have done several disruptive edits in that period.

There are other dubious references such as that to the China_Compulsory_Certificate, but for now I left them as I'm less sure about them.

By the way, semantic web is not really about "scraping information on web sites".

Gabrolf (talk) 14:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I assume the line "Common Criteria is used as the basis for a Government driven certification scheme and typically evaluations are conducted for the use of Federal Government agencies and critical infrastructure." Refers to the set-up in a particular country, and may not apply in all other cases? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Resag (talk • contribs) 08:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Common Criteria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080220132906/http://www.cesg.gov.uk:80/site/iacs/index.cfm?menuSelected=3&displayPage=3tohttp://www.cesg.gov.uk/site/iacs/index.cfm?menuSelected=3&displayPage=3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120417104556/http://www.niap-ccevs.org:80/cc_docs/CC_Community_Paper_10_Jan_2011.pdftohttp://www.niap-ccevs.org/cc_docs/CC_Community_Paper_10_Jan_2011.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Common Criteria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080220132906/http://www.cesg.gov.uk:80/site/iacs/index.cfm?menuSelected=3&displayPage=3tohttp://www.cesg.gov.uk/site/iacs/index.cfm?menuSelected=3&displayPage=3
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160102065510/http://knol.google.com/k/hussain-shah/common-criteria-iso-15408/3qj8qq7sspvdc/1tohttp://knol.google.com/k/hussain-shah/common-criteria-iso-15408/3qj8qq7sspvdc/1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Common Criteria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080220132906/http://www.cesg.gov.uk:80/site/iacs/index.cfm?menuSelected=3&displayPage=3tohttp://www.cesg.gov.uk/site/iacs/index.cfm?menuSelected=3&displayPage=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I've read the section about protection profiles and Security Functional Requirements and don't get the difference between both of them. They are security features of the TOEs, so what's the difference? Please, someone have to make clear on this.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common Criteria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080801151344/http://www.cesg.gov.uk/site/caps/index.cfmtohttp://www.cesg.gov.uk/site/caps/index.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Golmate (talk • contribs) 14:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys,

By reviewing the following sentence:

Common Criteria is a framework in which computer system users can specify their security functional and assurance requirements (SFRs and SARs respectively) through the use of Protection Profiles (PPs)

, it should be noted that it is not accurate to state that PPs are used to specify SFRs, since a developer may define a whole ST -including the SFRs- without the need to refer to a PP.

Can any of the main editors rephrase this statement to clarify this concept?

Thanks

Update: I changed the statement to clarify this fact.