Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Bitrate  
4 comments  




2 TOC at bottom  
2 comments  




3 Add column for 'year' and row for 'hard drive'  
1 comment  




4 This page should be called Comparison of *audio* recording media  
1 comment  













Talk:Comparison of recording media




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Bitrate[edit]

Bitrate is filesize divided by playtime, and playtime is filesize divided by bitrate. Calculations for digital audio players' length were done like this:

10 GB == 1024 x 1024 x 1024 x 8 bits
      == 8589934592 bits
8589934592 /  64000 == 134217.728  seconds → 37 hours 16 minutes
8589934592 / 128000 ==  67108.864  seconds → 18 hours 38 minutes
8589934592 / 320000 ==  26843.5456 seconds →  7 hours 27 minutes

Audio bitrates usually done with 1k == 1000. --Kjoonlee 08:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

10GiB actually equals 85899345920 bits (10 x 1024 x 1024 x 1024 x 8 bits). 4.242.147.41 (talk) 19:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. :) New numbers updated using the "GNU units" program. 372.82, 186.41, 74.56 hours. --Kjoonlee 06:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are digital media players usually measured in GB or GiB? I was under the impression that they were in 1000 GBs. We might want to fix the article to confirm this. 4.242.147.156 (talk) 23:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TOC at bottom[edit]

Did you know that with no proper ==headers==, the table of contents comes out at the bottom of the article.Jidanni (talk) 01:07, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Five years later, the table of contents has moved to the top. At this rate, the TOC will not reach the moon. smile OSborn arfcontribs. 03:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Add column for 'year' and row for 'hard drive'[edit]

Improvement suggestions:
An excellent addition to this table would be adding the year that each technology was introduced.

Also for completeness, a row can be added to list a high capacity hard drive. Current portable versions are as high as 2TB, with nonportable at 4TB. As the list stands right now, there is nothing shown in the terrabyte capacity range.Vybr8 (talk) 02:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be called Comparison of *audio* recording media[edit]

There are many other recording media, such as film, paper, magnetic tape, and so on. Graefestrasse (talk) 09:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Comparison_of_recording_media&oldid=1201080190"

Categories: 
Start-Class Professional sound production articles
High-importance Professional sound production articles
WikiProject Professional sound production articles
 



This page was last edited on 30 January 2024, at 21:59 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki