This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
often less than $1 US
sorry but often is greatly exaggregated here, yes you can get controllers for below $1 but these are the exeption
even in quantyties 10k+. check any supplier you like (atmel, microchip, renesas, any).
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
As a control engineer myself, I think the Control engineering section covers most of what is covered here (and in fact most of the stuff I was thinking of adding to this page).
However, the fuzzy logic paradigm may provide scalability for large control systems where conventional methods become unwieldy or costly to derive: if it's more than the personal believing of the author, an authoritative reference would be nice. Engelec20:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
1. It would be nice to label the images that have no caption.
2. I didn't quite understand what was the purpose of the image in the "Linear control" section so I moved it to the "Proportional control" section which later address underdamping and overdamping.
3. The "PID control" section does not explain that PID stands for proportional, integral and derivative. I think the information should be added. Also, proportional control is introduced earlier. It would be nice to add a note to say to refer to the proportionality information above or move the entire "proportional control" section between the "PID control" section and the "derivative action" section.
4. The still image of the response of a system is redundant with the live image of the response of a system. I would consider eliminating the second.
PID acronym is defined in it's first occurrence in the Proportion control section. The PID control section has a {{Main}} link to PID controller where the acronym is explained. Another acronym definition in this article is unnecessary.
