Contents

Talk:Copper indium gallium selenide solar cell

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Copper indium gallium selenide solar cell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chemistry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Energy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Crystalline silicon#Energy payback time|energy payback time]] The anchor (#Energy payback time) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Copper indium gallium selenide and Copper indium gallium selenide solar cells cover the same basic ground. Copper indium gallium selenide solar cell is a better title than the WP:MOS-offending plural version. Jojalozzo 16:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes. Merge them all. --Wtshymanski (talk)

I am not a domain expert. Copper indium gallium selenide solar cells appears to be the best developed of the three articles. I propose we do the merge in "Copper indium gallium selenide solar cells", rename it (would require deleting an existing page), and set up the redirects.

1. What material is in the other two that is missing from "Copper indium gallium selenide solar cells"?
2. My current preference is for the more general title (the name of the technology): "Copper indium gallium selenide". Jojalozzo 01:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contra. The articles admittedly have heavy overlap, which is not a good thing. The topics should be properly separated rather than merged. A CIGS solar cell with its characteristics (subtypes, manufacturing, efficiencies, companies) is not the same as the CIGS material that has it's own characteristics (electron and hole mobilities, doping properties, supply etc). I see two alternatives:

1. Keep them as separate articles, but link them heavily so that future editors put the information in either one or the other.
2. Make a CIGS material article, with a sub-topic "CIGS solar cells". This may not do the solar cells justice (as they'll be a subchapter then, and will result in an article that is composed of mainly that subchapter.

Thoughts? Michi zh (talk) 12:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that there is no article on the amorphous selenium cell that was common in light meters in the 1960's (and maybe a little earlier). In the 1970's, most light meters used CdS cells, which are likely more reliable, but require an external power source, usually a battery. But they should be described somewhere! Gah4 (talk) 09:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, the cells mentioned in this patent:^[1] Gah4 (talk) 10:01, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article currently has two "Properties" sections. I suppose that they should either be merged or renamed. --130.180.18.14 (talk) 11:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: MovedtoCopper indium gallium selenide solar cell, along with Tin-based perovskite solar cell and Polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cell mentioned by Extraordinary Writ. No such user (talk) 07:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copper indium gallium selenide solar cells → Copper indium gallium selenide solar cell – use singular 2601:541:4580:8500:F174:6C:6B68:5B48 (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per WP:NCPLURAL and for consistency with most of the entries in Category:Solar cells. Tin-based perovskite solar cells and Polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells probably need to be moved as well. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.