This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Crom Dubh is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations.
If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Crum-dubh or Crom-dubh was a REQUESTED article in the mythology section * previously, and is a PROPER noun. As it speaks about a legendary idol/god, I think it is perfectly encyclopedic. The quote is to put it in context.
Please tell me why you think otherwise. --MacRusgail 19:51, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm known for being a fan of IPA pronunciation guides but having THREE Irish variants is insane. I propose reducing that to the Lárchanúint (or something close to) pronunciation. We can't expect people to be aware or even interested in Irish dialectology to that extent. Akerbeltz (talk) 21:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think they're that vastly different either. I can think of other Gaelic terms with much bigger variations in pronunciation.--MacRusgail (talk) 19:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Astounding. This has been sitting here since 2006.
It is apparently just due to the misidentification of a scanned book on archive.org. It would have been enough to glance at the title page.
It's not "Voyage of Bran" at all, it's Nutt, The Celtic Doctrine of Re-Birth.
"book ii, p49" should have been a dead giveaway. Voyage of Bran has no "book II", and it has no pagination.
But even the page number was miscited, it is page 149, not page 49. Cleary a typo by the already far-out careless submitter, but it has stood here for eight years.
--dab(𒁳) 14:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Crom Dubh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
