Contents

Talk:Crystal structure prediction

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Are crystal structures predictable?: No."[edit]

That's the opening of a memorable article by Gavezzotii (1994) in Accounts of Chemical Research. Of course, some progress has been made since then, but still I think it would be a good reference to cite. :) --Itub (talk) 02:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice line. This article is based on a literature report I wrote for my degree - it's got loads more references in, including that one.

If anyone wants to add a little, the report is on my website: http://www.benjamin-mills.com/bristol/CSP.pdf

Ben (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is oddly centric and misinformed. First of all, contrary to what many organic chemists like to think (including the one that wrote this article), the physics and history of this field has only very recently had much of anything to do with modeling organic crystals. It's foundations and depth are foremost in the realm of metallurgists, solid state physicists, and the material scientists and engineers who grew and grow inorganic crystals (not the recent work in proteins).

Second of all, Linus Pauling is a peripheral, minor contributor to this field - not remotely the founder or father of it, contrary to what is indicated in this article.Wikibearwithme (talk) 04:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Single-purpose user Hedaors (whose only WP contributions are to insert references to CALYPSO method) keeps adding references to CALYPSO. This looks not only like self-promotion, but also like vandalism. Last time this user inserted a CALYPSO reference for molecular mechanics, which is inappropriate. Parts of text related to other methods were distorted to be another CALYPSO reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:660:4401:6002:226:55FF:FEE8:8E02 (talk) 18:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crystal structure prediction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317001833/http://projects.ivec.org/gulp/tohttp://projects.ivec.org/gulp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]