Contents

Talk:Cultural identity

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cultural identity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days

This article was nominated for deletion on October 18, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anthropology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lauralim13 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Isabellaorttega, Isabellaortegaa19, MRayCall.

I'm not an anthropology student, but I am an avid reader of this website. The last section about the internet does not read in the same neutral tone as the rest of Wikipedia. It reads like the author is writing a high school English essay, rather than a Wikipedia article. It uses overly fanciful language, such as "The internet is becoming an extension of the expressive dimension of the youth condition." It isn't restating information taken from another source, it's the making broad generalizations with fluffy words, and tellign a story to make a point. Amtrak Official (talk) 6:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

In the opening part of the article about people who have their cultural identity change more it sounds very opinionated and not at all neutral and unbiased. Particularbeach (talk) 04:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I've added the POV lead template. I've also added Tone as much of the article isn't written in an encyclopedic style (evidenced e.g. by multiple uses of "we"). AVDLCZ (talk) 23:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 23 March 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chase2424 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Skyjay999, Zmbois, MacBook2024, Orangetruncate, Kreiswig, Grackle.cackle.

— Assignment last updated by RiverScullerPDX (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The description section appears to be disorganized, and restating the intro paragraph in a lot of ways. I think that the paragraph about Nation could be given its own section where postcolonial framework of teaching in education could be discussed. I also think that the paragraph after that one could be removed, it uses "we" a lot. Jennlu (talk) 06:14, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that a section about biculturalism can be added that discusses more about the experiences of people who are split between two or more cultures. Topics include assimilation, acculturation, generational trauma, hybridity. Jennlu (talk) 06:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]