Contents

Talk:Cyclone Kate (2006)

	Cyclone Kate (2006) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 27, 2010 Good article nominee Listed July 13, 2024 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article was nominated for merging with 2005–06_Australian_region_cyclone_season on 2024-07-11. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Merge.

Text and/or other creative content from Cyclone Kate (2006) was copied or moved into 2005–06_Australian_region_cyclone_season with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Looks good overall, should pass GA no problem. There's one sentence that has me confused – The system remained nearly stationary over the northwestern Coral Sea in response to a mid-level, equatorial ridge to the north. How can a storm do nothing "in response" to something? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Kate (2006)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC) No issues. It's a very concise and, despite its brevity, informative page worthy of GA status. Passed. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]