This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
The bias at the page is visible via particular usage of terms. I suggest using neutral ones because Wikipedia is an independent encyclopedia and such bias damages neutrality. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 07:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yuto is right, GizzyCatBella is pushing hysterical non-neutral language. GizzyCatBella is also denying the role of the Slovak state in the Holocaust of the Jews by removing "and their allies" from the Holocaust sentence. The Slovak state deported the Jews to their death, not the Nazis, The Holocaust in Slovakia.--Iron Thain (talk) 09:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can you show the same neutrality for articles related to socialism? The way of language used in particular articles regarding socialist Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia is so biased. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to ask why is here presented as official coat of arms of Czechoslovakia the coat of arms of Czechoslovak socialist republic. I do not deny that socialist coat of arms was used between 1960 and 1990. But this period was not the most defining period of Czechoslovakia. In fact, socialist regime hijacked the Czechoslovak state. The founding idea of Czechoslovakia was not soviet communism. The founding idea of Czechoslovakia came from Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk, which was quite opposite of soviet communism. If Czechoslovakia was founded as state based on soviet communism, it would make sense, if there is presented the socialist coat of arms. But the soviet communism rather hijacked Czechoslovak state and replaced its original coat of arms by the socialist one. It would make sense, if you replaced the communist coat of arms either by coat of arms of Czechoslovakia right before its dissolution or by coat of arms of Czechoslovakia based on idea of Masaryk, i. e. the coat of arms that was official between 1920 and 1960. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:830A:B20D:D300:F9C7:6C6F:3532:60DA (talk) 12:33, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Their are two dates used for the dissoloution of the state, being December 31, 1992 and January 1, 1993 and they are used interchangeably. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 00:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ŘČS and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 13#ŘČS until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
