 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2005 November 17. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I am the author of the article on Dan Smoot which was proposed for deletion [and now has been deleted]. The reasons for deletion proposed by reviewers seem ill-informed to me.
First, my article is based upon many years of research, including obtaining, for the first time, several FBI headquarters and field office files about Dan Smoot and his newsletter, Dan Smoot Report, and his book, The Invisible Government.
Second, contrary to one reviewer's assertion, Dan Smoot was a very "notable" figure in right-wing conspiracy circles. He represented the "best and the brightest" of his era. He successfully completed bachelor's and master's degrees and was close to achieving his doctoral degree in American Civilization at Harvard University when he decided, instead, to seek employment with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. During his 9+ year career with the FBI, he worked at 4 FBI field offices as well as at FBI Headquarters where he served, for a time, as a Supervisor in the section which reviewed CIA applicants as well as a speaker and writer for the FBI.
After leaving the FBI, Smoot associated himself with multi-millionaire H.L. Hunt's organization, Facts Forum. He subsequently published his own weekly newsletter [Dan Smoot Report] which started out with 3000 subscribers (1956) and grew to 16,639 in 1961 and 33,289 in its peak year, 1965.
Dan was also a radio and TV commentator which, at the peak, was seen or heard on more than 350 radio and TV stations. In 1971, Dan merged his newsletter into the John Birch Society's weekly newsmagazine, Review of the News
Many of the controversies which inflamed local communities around the U.S. during the 1960's were the direct result of articles written by Smoot. Such controversies included purported "Communist plots" and "subversives" in such matters as fluoridation of water, mental health legislation, the civil rights movement, the United Nations, rock music, Council on Foreign Relations, the National Council of Churches, the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, and numerous other subjects. Dan became embroiled in several noteworthy libel lawsuits, one of which involved the League of Women Voters.
The complete text of my 26-page article may be found at:
http://ernie1241.googlepages.com/smoot
My research into right-wing conspiracy arguments and their proponents has been cited in numerous books and doctoral dissertations because I often have been the first person to request and receive FBI (and other government agency) files and documents pertaining to this subject area.
The FBI told me several years ago that I was their single largest requester (5% of all requests received). I now have received over 300,000 pages of documents obtained via FOIA requests to government agencies. I also have many thousands of pages of private correspondence from college and university archives as well as newspaper/magazine articles, congressional hearings, radio/tv broadcast transcripts, etc.
More details available from: ernie1241@aol.com
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ernie1241 (talk • contribs) 08:11, November 25, 2005 (UTC)
Aren't the sources indicated in this comment adequate if they are integrated into the article to delete the "sources" template at the top?
Rlquall 17:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why is this here? As far as I can tell, none of the individuals listed in it is noteworthy, either in their own right or as part of what makes Dan Smoot noteworthy. I suggest deleting whole section, but I am willing to discuss the topic if anyone objects. Rks13 (talk) 23:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dan Smoot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dan Smoot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
