This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
The first 9 seconds of Christina Milian's "Until I Get Over You" sounds kinda like the first 9 second's of Dance with My Father. Could they've inspired either one or the other? (instrumental wise) 80.57.225.8614:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose page views aren't everything. The album peaked at #1 on the Billboard 200, while the song only peaked at #38 on the Hot 100. SSTflyer04:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Truth, SSTflyer: it debuted at number one; so did Monica's After the Storm the following week, pushing the other album out. I don't know why the albums debuted at number one, but that does not mean the album was the multi-platinum seller or anything like that. Also, even when the peak was higher than that, the album didn't have any other notable original tracks than the titular song; covers of oldies don't count. George Ho (talk) 06:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Is the album or the song by the same artist most important? Apples and pears. Does either article contain "long-term significance?" The ideal solution would be to keep (album) for the album, (song) for the song and delete and saltDance with My Father. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No joke, but George, are you saying the guidelines are now immutable rules? Not that I thought the "ideal solution" would fly, if we reduce the choice to two articles instead of three and both are clearly marked as to content, then nobody gets lost. If a genuine PT is created then we can RM the article. Maybe there are problems with the idea, but I am not seeing them yet. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm saying that we should respect that rule, even when not considered policy, Rich. I was gonna discuss enabling or disabling AutoComplete until I figured that you implicitly disregarded the primary topic proposal. If not moved (or no consensus), then the disambiguation page may (as I hate to admit) still be needed, especially for those who disabled the AutoComplete and when there is no absolute primary topic in question. Of course, you can propose a change to the rule at WT:disambiguation, but I wouldn't change one bit of it, even when I can do copy editing on it. --George Ho (talk) 18:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you explain a little more, Unreal7? TWODABS normally discourages a disambiguation page when one of the two of the same name is the primary topic, but it still allows a disambiguation page when neither of two topics is the primary topic. George Ho (talk) 22:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have just modified one external link on Dance with My Father (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on Dance with My Father (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.