This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
To clarify, my comment should read ""Forever Young" does not appear to be a single (not for chrono)": the not was inadvertently left out. In their discography, it is listed with "Other charted songs" rather than with "Singles". If it is re-added as a single, it shouldn't be linked without an article and the year needs to be included. —Ojorojo (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:SONGTRIVIA regarding the necessity of the above-mentioned section. The information is trivial and not worth including just because the song was used/a reliable source mentioned it being used. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Only pop-rap and trap should be listed as genres since it is just the synths that are mentioned as being EDM, also pipe to Pop rap
Change the lead to mentioning in the first sentence that it was recorded for their "first Korean extended play, Square Up (2018)." Regarding the lead single sentence, change it to saying it was released as the album's lead single with the wikilink
"It was written by" → "The song was written by" and this should be the second sentence instead of the single release
"while its title imitates" → "while the title imitates"
The second para is out of order; add a sentence about the reviews the song received with what was praised at the start and follow this with the lists it was placed on, then commercial performance
"number one in Singapore, Malaysia," → "number one in Singapore and Malaysia," although these peaks need writing out in prose in the commercial section
"It was certified double platinum" → "The song was certified double platinum"
"Its accompanying music video was uploaded to the group's official YouTube channel on the same day" → "An accompanying music video was uploaded to Blackpink's YouTube on the same day as the single release"
Remove the one billion statistic since only two billion is notable in the context of the lead, also can you try to add synopsis to the section and summarize it here?
Asides from the music shows, you should add a couple or so of other notable performances like Coachella Festival and Stephen Colbert with the year of them too
"becoming a viral dance move." something better like "representative" should be used rather than viral per the body, plus re-invoke the ref here since you use a direct quote
Either only have "fierce" in quotes or use [] for pop-rap since the source says "fierce hip-pop track", making the genre fine but direct quoting needs to be paraphrased here
"on top of the bassline" the source only mentions the beat so re-word to this, or is my translator wrong?
Yonhap News Agency should not be italicized
Add the names of the authors from the publications mentioned
[10] should be re-invoked after the first sentence per usage of a direct quote
"when they were given the demo" → "when they heard the demo"
[11] does not mention chord progression, plus only trap is sourced not EDM too for this song; a way to replace would be to invoke the Paper ref for EDM elements somewhere suitable here
"synthesizers while the chorus sees the group members delivering" → "synthesizers, while the chorus sees the group members repeating" with the wikilink
"Its lyrical content, such as" → "The lyrical content, such as"
"celebrate the member's success" → "celebrate the members' success" although where is the re-assurance and strength sourced?
"Benjamin added that "from" → "Benjamin added, "From" per the source
"writing that "it's a" → "writing, "It's a"
Place the The Forty-Five review partially in your own words for something like "it is rare for K-pop intros to be as recognizable as..." to avoid overquoting
None of the Taylor Glasby views are backed up from the source; please re-word this to fit his review
OTT means "over the top", and emotional build into the chorus gave the vocalists space to power up → "emotional build into the chorus that gave the members space to demonstrate their vocal ability"
"it lacked the" → "the track lacked the" and invoke the ref at the end of this sentence too per direct quoting
Regarding the Melon and Rolling Stone rankings, these need to be written out in prose too for you to keep them in the lead and the music video rankings should be in that section itself
The second number one single is not sourced, plus change the sentence to "in the country and scored the highest..." removing the part about beating the other song since this is not mentioned anywhere
"It remained atop" → "The song remained atop"
"for both download and streaming by" → "for streaming and download by" to have consistency with the order
"on April 11, 2019." → "on April 11, 2019, respectively."
For correct order, add the Malaysia and Singapore peaks after South Korea
"debuted at number 6" → "debuted at number six" per MOS:NUM
"peaked at number 2" → "peaked at number two" per above
"debuted at number 7" → "debuted at number seven"
Update that the certification was platinum and specify this was in Japan
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this has some problems with information not backed up but can be fixed with research! --K. Peake12:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that I have addressed everything, please let me know if I have missed any. Thanks for your review as always ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk14:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nkon21 Sorry for the late response, I was unaware since you had not @ me and I'll go over this now after having done some copyediting. I still need you to add a source for the digital release, wikilink YouTube Rewind to itself instead of the platform's main page, change "for both download and streaming by" to the consistent order, remove wikilink on Psy altogether in music video since he is linked in a previous section and fix MOS:QWQ issues where the refs have "" inside them, also are you sure captions should not be used for charts and release history? --K. Peake18:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake Ok, I addressed the points you brought up. There are table captions in the charts and release history sections, although sr-only. Also, is there somewhere where editors have said that music recording bodies must be written out? Several FAs I looked at simply uses the country names too. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk04:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The edits I've made consisting of added K-Pop to "genre" in infoboxes or in the descriptions of articles were getting removed, most edit summaries say K-Pop is not a genre.
are unassessed)
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this has some problems with information not backed up but can be fixed with research! --K. Peake 12:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
