Contents

Talk:Decentralized exchange

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cryptocurrency Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Finance & Investment Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

non-notable exchanges[edit]

As I understand, standard notability requirement for inclusion into lists in articles is having a Wikipedia article. Sometimes the requirement is relaxed to having significant coverage in independent reliable sources, that is qualifying for an article. I would suggest not to relax the requirement given the special situation with general sanctions on the topic. I see that most of entries in the list do not meet even the relaxed requirement. I propose to clean up this list to include exchanges with Wikipedia articles only. Retimuko (talk) 19:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Џ 21:48, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree I've been working my best to keep this page informative, so I would be sad to see a lot of it go even for the greater good. I made a copy in my Sandbox in case I find the time to revisit and build articles on at least the more notable ones later, but for now I fully support the removal. Dr-Bracket (talk) 05:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and removed it. As the creator of it, I should have been more weary of the notability guidelines and I see no reason to keep it up after this short discussion. If anyone objects or would like to work on sources to create notability on the exchanges, I've kept a copy on my Sandbox page. Dr-Bracket (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]