Contents

Talk:Diaper bag

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diaper bag article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It's unclear to me what relation these references have to diaper bags... ^ My Child magazine. Retrieved on March 10, 2008. ^ Australian Breastfeeding Association: Breast and Nipple Care. Australian Breastfeeding Association. Retrieved on March 10, 2008. ^ About Nutrition. Ngala: Parenting with Confidence. Retrieved on March 10, 2008. ^ Nappy rash. Children, Youth and Women's Health Services (October 26, 2006). Retrieved on March 10, 2008. Canuckle (talk) 00:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They're a little dubious, okay. I've formatted them but have earmarked them for upgrading to something more relevant, once I get a spare minute here - Alison ^❤ 00:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you can remove the ones I added entirely if you like. I got a pamphlet on Nappy Rash from the GP and surfed from it to three online sources. I found something that said that talc was deprecated and suggested alternative preventative measures, so I added it with the citation. I hamfistedly tried to insert the other two wherever they vaguely fit, in an effort to stave off my first WP:AFD, raising the links on the article page like I would normally on the talk page. At that point, the AFD seemed likely to sentence deletion and I thought the big AFD tag was scaring off any serious information-seekers anyway, so simply showing to potential AFD folk that academic study of diapering, etc. was available seemed paramount. After having read more about the WP:DP#Processes, I learned what alternatives there were, like writing on the talk page and linking the AFD discussion to that and I realized how ignorant and unscholarly my actions were. I apologize. :)--Thecurran (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]