This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
The article states the circulation is 209,000 without reference nor year. I found a source from BBC that listed the circulation at 270,000 from 2006. "The press in Germany". BBC. 31 October 2006. Does anyone have a more recent source? DutchTreat (talk) 14:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There should a full paragraph as this "newspaper" is notorious for trying to incite hate against Turks and Turkey at every opportunity. As much of Zionist Axel Springer Group's so called "journalist media" which is actually a propaganda machine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.231.101.95 (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Before other panelists could weigh in, he already got response from the moderation staff:
"Lieber Adorno, es soll sich um einen begrenzten Einsatz auf der Suche nach Leichen von Geiseln der islamistischen Terrororganisation Hamas handeln, teilte das israelische Militär am Donnerstag mit. Lieben Gruß Die WELT-Community-Redaktion" (Quite a lecture/rebuke!)
After that there were responses from two other online penalists: one in favor of "Adorno" and one in favour of WELT. The latter wrote in one post:
"Die Babys und Kleinkinder wurden und werden antisemitisch und gewaltverherrlichend gegenüber Juden und Israel erzogen und sind in deren Gesellschaft nichts weiter als zukünftige Terroristen『
And in the second follow-up post this got even practical:
』.. All diese Kinder sind eine zukünftige Bedrohung der israelischen Zivilisten. Wenn du das verhindern willst, muss Israel alle Babys und Kleinkinder den Familien wegnehmen und in Heimen oder Pflegefamilien nach westlichen Werten erziehe."
This user didn't get any rebuke from the content moderation. That's a telling example for the very selective stance of "DIE WELT" moderation staff in regard to toxic online comments on their webpage. For even one moderate conversational violation ("Ironie nie!") from someone who's against the political goal of DIE WELT, there's swift rebuke -- but for repeated outrageous content from one who's considered on the right side, there's silence. Nomirto (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
