This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
[[Planet#Objects formerly considered planets|Former classification of planets]] The anchor (#Objects formerly considered planets) has been deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
Most sources -- astronomical, mythological, and dictionaries -- give the pronunciation as [dye-OH-nee], though a few, including some at JPL/NASA, have [DYE-uh-nee].
All three vowels are long (Dīōnē), so the stress should be on the o. The Greek adj. form is Dīōnaios, so in English Dionean (dye'-a-nee'-un) would be the expected form. kwami 2005 June 30 02:14 (UTC)
thx for the tip on Dionean, it helps a lot. So in Portuguese is Dioniana. I've notice the problem of pronunciation in English. All articles in English are full of that pronunciation. We pronunciate in the way it is written, the problem is that the name must be translated, thus is is an herculean work in these new moonlets of Saturn :\ often with the strangest names in the world. Hope you give the same greek-English tips in other articles. ;) -Pedro00:08, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I swapped it for a new Cassini image. Jyril, you suggested when you fixed up the coding (sorry about that!) that maybe it should be cropped. However, it's rare to find a photo showing that a moon belongs to a particular planet, especially one as beautiful and detailed as this one, so I'd suggest keeping it as is. kwami18:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The image is wonderful -- no argument about that. Problem is that Dione should be more on focus, now Saturn at background slightly "steals" Dione's importance... Otherwise the image is perfect ("true" color, whispy terrain visible and so on).
By the way, it's somewhat funny how Dione is often imaged over Saturn, only seldom has other major moons been imaged at that position.--Jyril19:23, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
What I like about it is that is shows Dione in context, rather than as an isolated body. Cropping would remove the rings, etc, and therefore much of the context.
BTW, someone just changed a caption, claiming that there are no km-high fractures on Dione. Take a look at this for a large crater bisected by a fracture. kwami01:45, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remember those are oblique views and the only references I can find for non-crater cliff heights on Dione are in the 500-1000 meter range, not several km, like Ithaca Chasma. Not saying that they can't be that high, but I have seen no reference for it, and I think the text should be conservative regarding height claims. I changed the caption text to make sure that it wasn't insinuated that the large cliff seen in the image was tectonic, when in fact it is a crater rim. Volcanopele21:44, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I posted the original image and caption; sorry for the mistakes, I must have misnterpreted or misremembered some information. Thanks for the correction! The Singing Badger22:17, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that the caption for the title photo has been changed to call it a "Montage". It is not technically a montage. It would be a montage if an image of Saturn and an image of Dione were combined to create one image showing Dione over the limb of Saturn. Instead, this is a color composite of three images taken in the blue, green, and red filters on Cassini's Wide angle camera. All three color filter images showed the same scene of Dione over Saturn's limb. So, I would suggest this be changed. Volcanopele01:47, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Surface gravity of Dione as the most dense Saturn moon after Titan, is only 2,2 % of Earth's. It is even twice as lower than Hyperion's, which has lower density and is much smaller. I think this should be checked. -- 194.249.63.20817:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on Dione (moon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
I have just modified 2 external links on Dione (moon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
