 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The Brick Awards article by itself is merely a listing of award winners and adds nothing that isn't discussed on this talk page. Furthermore, the Brick Awards were renamed Do Something award anyway, so it makes since that the awards be a subsction on the Do Something page.--RossF18 (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - the Brick Awards should be moved under DoSomething.org's entry as part of it's history. Geweiner (talk) 23:27, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree. The Brick Awards page cannot stand alone. Ninabean (talk) 17:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC) heloo[reply]
This is written like a press release from the Do Something people. It is nothing more than an advertisement, and should probably be rewritten to not read like it came from a Do Something press kit. 69.129.190.2 (talk) 23:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This post is supported by references from the New York Times, celebrity outlets and VH1's website. Content is accurate according to multiple sources and it references several fortune 500 companies. This is not an ad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.244.197 (talk) 19:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mere accuracy is insufficient to demonstrate it is not an ad. There must also be NPOV and cannot be ad-like language. One easy way to accomplish this is by not allowing the Do Something people to write their own article, if that is what has happened. (128.111.174.70 (talk) 15:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC))[reply]
"Do something" would be a perfect title for an organisation to mitigate global warming. Since children are the ones who will suffer (many will still be alive in 2100) it makes sense that children are motivated to DO SOMETHING even if adults are failing miserably. A good example of this kind of organisation is Plant for the Planet in Germany. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.22.54.243 (talk) 18:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above comment is, at best, using WP as a forum and, at worst, a spam edit of no relevance to Do Something or Wikipedia. (128.111.174.70 (talk) 15:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC))[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Do Something. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Do Something. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I want the article to be deleted since none of what it says is objective they explain everything positively GenZenny (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
