This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Large sections of this article are written in various unencyclopædic styles (jocular, marketeering/PR, personal essay, POV, OR, etc.) and are in need of substantial rewrite. I have applied the relevant template to the article, though likely will not have time to contribute to the rewrite myself in the near future. —ScheinwerfermannT·C04:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
+++ China Minivan +++
I added the statement about the minivans being sought after in China in the 1990's. This is an interesting cultural thing - something that is dull and drab in the states is a status symbol in China. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punkyqb (talk • contribs) 21:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
last one is very hot. but I have another one: Dodge JC and JCUV from Japan. theres a German article about it on wikipedia. can anyone translate it? I want to know if the car identically or there are any differnces. --91.89.159.194 (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dodge DID build full size cars between 1962 and 1964. From the book "Cars of the '60's" by The Editors of Consumer Guide, page 42:"While Plymouth struggled on
with shortened models for 1963, Dodge increased the standard wheelbase of its cars to 119 inches."......."The 1964 lineup was substantially the same as 1963's,
distinguished only by face-lifts." It should be noted that Ford and Chevrolet also used the 119 inch wheelbase for their full sized cars. It should also be noted
that Dodge hedged its bets in 1962 and kept a line of full sized 880's based on the Chrysler 122 inch wheelbase. (Also pp 42.)
70.255.146.97 (talk) 00:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One of the paragraphs in the post-war section states that bringing out the Dart to compete with Chevrolet and Ford was an advantage to Dodge. The very
next sentence says that this caused mid-priced Dodge sales to collapse. Doesn't seem to me that causing part of an automoble division's sales to collapse
would be a very good thing, unless the volume of the cheaper cars could make up the difference. This paragraph needs much clarification.
70.255.146.97 (talk) 01:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Dodge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
