![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi! I've added a 21-second sample of the song, though I did the beginning part. Should I have done a different part of the song? —THIS ISMESSEDOCKER (TALK) 06:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What is so homosexual about this song? MatteusH 00:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is homosexual because the song is talking about sex, but the man singing the song says "I'm gonna make a super-sonic man out of you." This hints to homosexual man-on-man sex. Also, it should be noted that the lead singer of Queens was gay.
So, we all agree the song is about sex. Why does the article not mention it? The song is extremely phallic. --67.172.13.176 (talk) 05:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm late to this discussion, so I don't expect any answers, but what is gay about "Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy"? That one is completely over my head. 24.189.90.68 (talk) 08:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In video Deacon sings backing vocals. Did he do that in record, too? --87.110.80.44 (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Removed information pertaining to the 'Learn by Doings' cover of the song, according to its download page, its chart peak is 607, hardly notable I would argue.
-- ckydavies 01:13 GMT, 20 Dec, 2008
Thats a great exsample don't stop me now is my best song —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.139.31 (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why did Brian May hate the song? BulsaraAndDeacon (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Should some mention be made of Russell Brand's claim that this song was written after Freddie spent a night with 80 rent boys? It's in Booky Wook 2 - a source:
I have no idea about the validity of this claim but I guess it should be looked into with a view to considering it for the article.
Nottrobin (talk) 14:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How can a 1979 song be on a 1978 album? :-)
Also anyone see a connection between this page and Hank Green's An Absolutely Remarkable Thing?? Yagirlfromanotherworld (talk) 23:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This recent news was added and reverted. A further source has the headline, "Scientists say this is the most feel-good song ever written". Should it be mentioned in the article? Burninthruthesky (talk) 09:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Don't Stop Me Now. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.magicmusic.net/blog/6/entry-90-pixar-play-parade/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can I add the fact that this song is scientifically proven to be the most feel good song of all time? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3238679/Queen-s-Don-t-Stop-feel-good-song-past-50-years-scientific-formula-proved-it.html I feel like in adding it I might be violating the neutral POV, so I just want to be sure AbdulAliAbdullah (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My fault, I just looked through the talk page and realized this issue was already adressed AbdulAliAbdullah (talk) 05:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
New to editing... May I suggest the following addition to the "In popular culture" section - Team GB used the song in a video following the 2012 London Olympic Games
There are several links to the video including https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWMySZa0TzQ&usg=AFQjCNEkRX7cCje6g842NG-aSxm1BtNXJg Icebsa (talk) 06:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Don't Stop Me Now. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that next to the length of the song it says '7/Album Version. Is there any particular reason for this? As far as I know the album and single versions were the same length, so why is it significant to mention that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UndoubtedlyMe (talk • contribs) 15:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For context: The recently (Sept 25th) released book An Absolutely Remarkable Thing has this Wikipedia article as a plot point. On page 28 of the hardcover (I just bought and started reading it) the protagonist is reading the article and notices a typo in the lead, and when she tries to fix it a new typo mysteriously appears instead, and that repeats once again. The recent vandalism has been adding those 4 typos. I haven't read beyond that (plus I don't want to spoil the unrelated-to-this-article book plot on the talkpage here) so I'm not sure how it develops from there. Now, the author of the book is a powerful force for good in this world (free educational materials, charitable work, and much more), so I'm only slightly frustrated at him that the novel is leading to minor vandalism. However, it is likely to continue at a low ebb for the next few months.
We might need to consider either longer-term semi-protection (thanks to user:Willondon and user:Ad Orientem for the current 2 day semi-protection :), or perhaps a temporary hidden-comment just above the first paragraph along the lines of <!-- Please do not vandalize this article in relation to the book by Hank Green. He wouldn't want you wasting other volunteers' time! -->
which might help dissuade most of these likely-first-time editors from petty vandalism. Perhaps we could even redirect their energy by adding "Maybe go fix a typo somewhere else?" or something.
Just notes and thoughts. :) Quiddity (talk) 04:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In dem Lied kommt der Supersonic Man vor. Wurde das lied für diesen Film verwendet? Auch für "Shazam! Film" scheint er verwendet worde zu sein. --88.67.204.48 (talk) 15:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]