I think EDXL Sharp is too narrow a topic to stand on its own as an article and the article is unlikely to grow much. I think it would be better served as a section of the EDXL article. —hulmem (talk) 02:51, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I could see that...however I wanted to keep "products" separate from the "standard". I will be adding some more information to this page as we grow the project, but I agree that it will be semi-static. However it is useful / informational in nature... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpmcgarry (talk • contribs) 19:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok...How do we resolve this? I don't want the suggestion to merge to appear on the EDXL page. One article discusses a data standard, another discusses a software tool that implements said standard. To me these are two different articles. I know others may not agree. What is the process to resolve this? Dpmcgarry (talk) 00:41, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
