Contents

Talk:Eben Byers

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). Golf Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pennsylvania Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pittsburgh Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an imageorphotographofEben Byersbeincluded in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search ToolorOpenverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The Wall Street Journal ran a headline reading "The Radium Water Worked Fine until His Jaw Came Off" after his death.

This is a lovely headline, but unfortunately the way it’s presented in the text is highly misleading (though not strictly wrong). The article in question is not, as the sentence makes it sound, contemporary, as is clear from the subtitle:

Cancer Researcher Unearths A Bizarre Tale of Medicine And Roaring '20s Society

and the text:

Nearly 20 years after Mr. Bailey’s death in 1949 of bladder cancer, medical researchers exhumed his remains.

as well as from the first reference given for the sentence, a 2003 blog post:

Years ago the Wall Street Journal recounted the grisly case under a particularly memorable headline: THE RADIUM WATER WORKED FINE UNTIL HIS JAW CAME OFF.

The article refers to “a report in today's Journal of the American Medical Association” by Roger M. Macklis (third and fourth paragraph), which is probably either “Radithor and the Era of Mild Radium Therapy” (doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450050072031) or “The Radiotoxicology of Radithor: Analysis of an Early Case of latrogenic Poisoning by a Radioactive Patent Medicine” (doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450050077032), both published 1 August 1990 and authored by Roger M. Macklis (et al. in the case of the second article). An article from 1990 would indeed be able to report on a ca. 1969 exhumation, and may well be referred to as “years ago” in a 2003 blog post.

I don’t want to remove the mention of the headline altogether, but I can’t think of a good way to phrase it that avoids this false impression. Does anyone else have a good idea? (Radithor#History would also have to be updated.) —Galaktos (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This has since been resolved, mainly at Special:Diff/986113168 and Special:Diff/810073340. Galaktos (talk) 23:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's an image of a gruesome nature: File:Eben Byers Without a Jaw.png.

Is it appropriate to include in the article? Chumpih ^t 20:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1: Are we certain this is a real photograph of the subject of the article? and 2: Is it freely available for use? If both are true, then 3: Is the image appropriate or needed for use in the article? Ifrit (Talk) 17:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ifrit It should be included in the article. It is indeed quite gruesome but if nothing else it does justice to his story. Mystman1 (talk) 17:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is the consensus amongst experts out there that the gruesome photo is not of Byers? Kingturtle = (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]