Contents

Talk:Ed (film)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Baseball Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Joke Article[edit]

This film was not a "critical and commercial success" and the new york times did not describe it as "laugh-tastic"

the film has a score of 2.2 on the IMDB. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.216.120 (talk) 11:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"An anonymous consensus has concluded that the "film" is the worst artistic accomplishment of modernity." This doesn't even have a link to a Geocities website with this claim, I'm removing it. 24.60.201.10 (talk) 20:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nardog, can you review these diffs?

• template added
• safesubst

I can delete the TfD stuff, but I'm not sure if you're saying that the post-safesubst code is acceptable or can be avoided? Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Erik: I said Try previewing the diff of {{subst:Rotten Tomatoes prose/sandbox|88|7.30|274}}. One puts safesubst in the template to be substed like this, not in an article, or otherwise there's no difference from the usual subst. I didn't make changes to the live template, and, as I said, you don't have to save your edit to see the effect, let alone in the main namespace. See what I added at the TfD. Nardog (talk) 00:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! I see that you mean "Show changes" and not "Show preview". Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 15:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]