Contents

Talk:Edict of Milan

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece: Byzantine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force. Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Human rights Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 13, 2015, June 13, 2017, June 13, 2019, June 13, 2020, and June 13, 2021.

Even after the Edict of Milan, didn't the Roman government continue to use government funds (taxes) to support pagan temples and so on? I thought that that government funding of paganism continued until 380-something when Christianity became the official religion of the empire. But I could be mis-remembering. Also, I hope the details I added about the Forty Martyrs of Sebaste aren't too disconnected from the rest of the article. It's a great story with a great icon to go with it. I think the names of at least most of those martyrs are recorded somewhere as well. Wesley 16:58, 16 Sep 2003 (UTC)

As I understand it (it's not a complicated document in itself), the intent of the Edict was to grant toleration, not to dick sponsorship. However, sponsorship of paganism diminished rapidly as a result. So, its effect was to detach paganism from its official privilege. Mkmcconn 20:47, 16 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I could be wrong but I think it's Theodosius I, circa 390-395, who went after paganism. Between Constantine and Theodosius was Julian the Apostate. Constantine himself was a Sol Invictus worshipper, the "legend" is that he converted to Christianity on his deathbed, which may or may not be true. However, he and Licinius did end "Diocletian's Massacre" of Christians of 303-312.

Mkmcconn is right. The edict was about toleration. Licinius went back on it in his last years, but then Constantine conquered the East too. As for Emperors who "went after paganism", you have Constantius II, under whom many temples were destroyed, and especially Valens. Gratian ended the sponsorship for the imperial cult by resigning the title Pontifex Maximus. Theodosius prohibited all public or private pagan cults. As for Constantine, he was a Christian since the Milvian Bridge, though he wasn't baptized until his death bed (a not so uncommon thing in those days) and for some time tolerated pagan iconography regarding himself. In how far he was a worshipper of the artificial Sol invictus is unsure, he wasn't really after his conversion 312. Str1977 19:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diocletian's Persecution ended in 311, 6 years after Dioceletian's retirement. It was ended by its main perpetrator Emperor Galerius in 311. MnJWalker 17:53, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Council of Arles was a more immediate consequence of the Milan declaration than the subsequent dynastic struggles developed in the article----Clive Sweeting

Please choose and use one in the article, do not use both AD and CE. --tonsofpcs _(Talk) 19:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The form CE has been used in this article since 25 August 2003. --Wetman 19:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I write this, the article uses the AD form. Since I'm not sure if this should be changed, I have decided not to change at the moment. 173.68.190.221 (talk) 22:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just rewrote some parts, removed Catholic POV and deleted at all the parts relative to Licinius' fate (they should be written in the dedicate entry). They looked a bit like as a pro-Catholic sermon, probably present in some old Cath. encyclopedia having no separate entry for Licinius.

I'm pretty sure a fragmentary copy of the edict survived from somewhere in Egypt. I'll make the change after I source that. Dppowell 23:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. Surely that should be Mediolanense? (The adjective is of the Third, of two endings).

64.89.246.203 (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I was just going to comment on that as well, unless it is supposed to mean "of the Milanese". All the Google results are from Wikipedia mirrors though. Must be a mistake. Adam Bishop (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The last paragraph needs some work. I left it largely as it is, but added some CNs. It may just be a problem of imprecise wording. I hope someone will fix it. JKeck (talk) 14:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a minor issue, but I came across an article in a peer-reviewed journal, where the author of the article argues that Eusebius didn't translate the Edict of Milan himself, but had someone else translate it for him. There's obviously no way of knowing for certain, but Eusebius himself also never expressly claims to have translated the document if you check his text in Greek. Should this be reflected in the text here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joonasvanhala (talk • contribs) 18:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"The Edict of Milan gave Christianity a legal status, but did not make Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire; this took place under Emperor Theodosius I in AD 380 with the Edict of Thessalonica."
1. Quite relevant information, but the wording makes it seem irrelevant.
2. Mentioning it as a state church before the notion of state church is even coined is weird.--Adûnâi (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dhruva Gamerx: Stating that the Edict of Milan made Christianity the state religion is highly deluded WP:CB. And the rest of your edits are value judgments based upon WP:OR.

Name one bona fide history department which teaches that Constantine made Christianity the state religion. WP:CITEaWP:RS for it, and bingo, you win this dispute. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edict of Milan 2601:C2:700:B410:881D:E2B3:F12C:EF37 (talk) 00:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

added sources for Edict of Milan (Constantine) not making Christianity the official state religion (Cambridge History of Christianity) and this act being done by Theodosius 43 years after Constantine's death (Britanica Encylopedia). We had a lengthy discussion about this over on the List_of_common_misconceptions page Rayguyuk (talk) 02:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]