This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Edmund Kirby Smith article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Shouldn't the name actually be "Edmund Kirby-Smith" (hyphenated)? That's the usage at Sewanee, and it's on his tomb. --Spewey 14:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I searched through the ORs and couldn't find any correspondence or orders from him that used a hyphen. Hal Jespersen 01:20, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
That's interesting, because while I accept your explanation, I've seen it as "Kirby-Smith" almost my whole life. Not that it makes me an expert, but I attended a successor institution to Western Military Academy. I'm pretty sure (but not at all certain) that the name of the LSU dorm is correct. I'll try to go to the Sewanee cemetery the next time that I'm through there and read the tombstone, but that's probably inadmissible original research in any event. I'm for leaving it as it is. Rlquall00:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My uncle married his great granddaughter (or great-great granddaughter - anyway, a direct descendant), and she spelled her name "Kirby-Smith". Also, on his grave it does say "Kirby-Smith", with a hyphen. Here is a photograph of the tombstone:
Jeffrey Prushankin, Associate Professor at Penn State-Abingdon has written a book published in 2006 by LSU Press on the relationship between Richard Taylor and Edmund Kirby Smith. He uses Kirby Smith as opposed to Kirby-Smith. I live in Tennessee, and know several graduates of the University of the South (Sewanee), where Kirby Smith spent the last 18 years of his life as a professor. They all refer to him as Kirby-Smith, and the monument to him and his gravestone all use the name Kirby-Smith. So the following appears to be the case: He went by Kirby Smith prior to and during the Civil War. After the Civil War he went by Kirby-Smith. My take anyways. User:Mpleahy17:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Parks' 1954 Biography (See References in article) adds further information on the Kirby Smith vs. Kirby-Smith issue. To distinguish himself from all the other "Smiths" who were Confederate generals, EKS signed all his dispatches "E.Kirby Smith". By the end of the war, he was known simply as General Kirby Smith. Shortly thereafter, the hyphen appeared, and all his known descendants use the surname "Kirby-Smith." But as his fame was a result of his Civil War activities, it is probably best to refer to him as Edmund Kirby Smith, which was how he referred to himself throughout the war. User:Mpleahy19:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As can be seen from his signature, Smith did not hyphenate his name, and he appears under S, not K, in the index to Shelby Foote's "The Civil War: A Narrative". Obviously, the Kirby started out as a middle name, a matronymic, and later became more common than Edmund as a substitute first name.The article should be edited to give uniform treatment--he is routinely called "Smith" early, and "Kirby Smith" later in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.124.72.192 (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Some additional discussion following the edits of January 4, 2011. If 'Smith' is offensive to family members, perhaps his father, Joseph Lee Smith, should have done something about his name. The secondary sources used for reference in this article do not cite a hyphenated surname. Those that are in encyclopedia format list him as "Smith, Edmund Kirby." It was moderately common in the 19th century for middle names to be used prominently, such as Dorsey Pender and Porter Alexander, but that does not affect the way we refer to them in their articles. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:07, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The encyclopedias you mention are wrong. His contemporaries called him "Gen. Kirby Smith." The Official Records, War of the Rebellion follow that usage. So does every scholarly work on the Civil War I've ever seen. And his father had nothing to do with it. Edmund and both his brothers all adopted "Kirby Smith" as their surname -- and with or without a hyphen is immaterial. For that reason, "Kirby" ought to be treated not as a middle name but as part of a two-barrelled surname. --Michael K SmithTalk21:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It looked like a mistake to mention EKS as part of the Army of the Potomac in July, 1861. This is generally the name of the main Union army. Further investigation reveals that this was briefly the name for the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia.
I fixed the link. This was an early army that was incorporated into the Army of Northern Virginia along with other forces. Hal Jespersen 20:30, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I rewrote this article because it was not in the typical format for a Wiki Civil War bio (which are normally presented in chronological order), but also because it was in copyright violation from http://www.civilwarhome.com/ksmithbio.htm. You can't just copy text from websites unless they are known to be in the public domain, like National Park Service battle descriptions or Fox's Regimental Losses. Hal Jespersen 01:20, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I added a line in about him being the last confederate general, because I read it on a Trivial Pursuit card. I have no other source for this, but would tend to believe it. Gabefarkas06:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, it's inaccurate. Rather than basing entries on a one liner in a card game, since Wikipedia focuses on verifiability, I commend you to any major Civil War history; Shelby Foote's or Bruce Catton's will do. Come to that, Stand Watie's own Wikipedia entry has it right. Ravenswing09:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You say he 'resigned his commission in the U.S. Army on April 6 [1861] to join the Confederacy.' Then 'On March 16, 1861, Smith entered the Confederate forces as a major in the regular artillery.'
Smith... dispatched half of Taylor's Army, Walker's Greyhounds, under the command of Maj. Gen. John George Walker northward to defeat Union Maj. Gen. Frederick Steele's incursion into Arkansas. This decision, strongly opposed by Taylor, caused great enmity between the two men.
The reasons for the disagreement are not made clear, either in this article or on Taylor's own wiki page. Where did Taylor want to deploy Walker? Valetude (talk) 11:37, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lucien Bonaparte Webster is described here as a Confederate officer who died in the war. The link to Webster shows that he was a US Army officer who died in 1853. Valetude (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Edmund Kirby Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified one external link on Edmund Kirby Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I round the section on Alexander Darnes totally mistifying. It seemed to come out of the blue. For it to make sense you have to have read the last paragraph in the Legacy and Honors section. That paragraph should be moved out of Legacy & Honors and should be placed at the beginning of the section on Darnes for two reasons. First, I skipped reading the Legacy & Honors section because I thought it was just going to be a recitation of awards and ranks. Instead there is substantive information. The second reason is that a statue of the general and a former slave that is made by one of his descendants and is placed in his former home is not an "Honor." I don't know what the "Legacy" part is supposed to be about, but a statue also doesn't seem like a legacy. Just my opinion. Ileanadu (talk) 16:06, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
