Contents

Talk:Ejnar Hertzsprung

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Denmark Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Astronomy: Solar System Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

"together with Russell"[edit]

I thought they didn't even know each other. LightSpeed (talk) 07:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking for more detail on how Cepheids were originally calibrated. In particular I would like to know:

1) Which Cepheids did Hertzsprung obtain a parallax for? I read it was 13, but that is the closest I have got to finding out which ones.

2) What equipment did he use? I think it was the 60 inch Hale telescope at the Mt Wilson Observatory, but I'd be interested to know if this is the case.

3) More details of his technique. The article says "statistical parallax", is that the same as Spectroscopic parallax? If so it is very different to Stellar parallax and that would explain something I have been puzzling about for some time, which is why modern space telescopes are having so much trouble with the stellar parallax of Polaris (the closest Cepheid) if Cepheids were successfully calibrated a hundred years ago!

The calibration of Cepheids was an important moment in the history of cosmology, I'd love to know more about it. Jemanuel-h (talk) 20:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jemanuel-h (talk • contribs) 20:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]