This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire articles
The Eleanor crosses are lavishly decorated stone monuments in the shape of a cross…
Had I started this article, I would have written something very similar. (I live not that far from one of them.) But looking at the pictures, I don’t see the cross shape. Either in elevation or plan view. Any ideas? Or am I missing something obvious? —Ian Spackman14:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suspect that they are similar to medieval market crosses which have mostly diverged from being cross shaped. Interestingly Chamber's Dictionary includes, 6 a a monument, not necessarily in the form of a cross; b as a place name: the site of such a monument. But it would seem to be true that this article shouldn't say Eleanor crosses are in the shape of a cross, so good catch. -- Solipsist12:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article says that the original cross was on the south side of Trafalgar Square, and was replaced by the equestrian statue of Charles I. Well, according to encyclopaedia britannica, that statue is on the north-east side of the square. Anybody know for a fact where the original cross was? It would be nice to know the exact centre of London, just for future displays of pedantry!
The Enc. Brit. picture
Why is it within the rules to describe the Stamford re-erection as 'contraversial' rather than 'Stunning', Beautiful' or 'Original'. The design is massively based on the Fragment mentioned, which appears to have come frem Rock House Brunnian (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Any possibility of someone clever making a map showing the locations of the twelve resting points, so we can visualise the final journey of Eleanor? Cheers, LindsayHi09:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see that this request got marked as "stale" and closed. I'll re-request it because, now that I've added coordinates for all the locations, it should be a no-brainer for our mapping experts to do this. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone ahead and worked out how to do this myself (with help from Keith's hint). I think the request at the graphic lab was being ignored because it was made in plain English rather than by following the letter of the instructions that mandate the use of some template to make a simple request. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article is close to being a B grade article, but it would need a bit more in the way of citations spread about in-line for that. I'd like to see it made up to FA eventually! It should not be too much work, I think some of the existing citations could be re-used later in the text, for example. If anyone has access to those texts, that is!--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 11:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Eleanor cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified one external link on Eleanor cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified one external link on Eleanor cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on Eleanor cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
There's an excellent early-C14 manuscript illumination, depicting what is widely agreed to be an unidentified Eleanor cross, in the Luttrell Psalter: available on Commons at p. 8 of this file. It would make a good addition to this article, but needs to be extracted and cropped, which is a bit beyond me. Does anyone want to volunteer? GrindtXX (talk) 14:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, many thanks for that, but I see what you mean: certainly no use for the lede image, which was one possibility I had in mind. It's also flawed by the fact that it's not an identifiable cross (and not certainly an Eleanor cross), and by the fact that we already have quite a lot of images. I still think it could be worked in somewhere, but I'll think about it. GrindtXX (talk) 18:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The map in this article used to show a section of England running from Lincoln in the north to London in the south, with the locations of the crosses marked. Something has gone wrong in the past few weeks, so that the focus of the map has shifted northwards: it is now centred on Lincoln, and only shows the northernmost 5 crosses in the bottom half. I have no idea what has caused this glitch. I posted a request on the Map workshop page a couple of days ago, but no responses so far. If no-one is willing or able to fix it, an alternative solution would be to use this map at right (though I'm not over-keen on it). Any comments? GrindtXX (talk) 18:26, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The immediate problem has now been fixed by AntiCompositeNumber. I'm still in two minds about which map is preferable (or whether further adjustments should be made to improve the existing map), so comments still welcome. GrindtXX (talk) 13:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
