Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Untitled  





2 Contradictions in online sources  
2 comments  




3 Wrong attribution of birth place  
4 comments  




4 Reads with an agenda  
1 comment  




5 Quote  
1 comment  




6 Birth date  
1 comment  




7 Top importance?  
1 comment  




8 Cecil Roth quote  
2 comments  













Talk:Eliezer Ben-Yehuda




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Untitled[edit]

Not only does this article not have the form of a standard Wikipedia article, but it's decidedly POV, making sweeping and probably false statements such as the introductory one. It also needs to be paragraphed.

If the contributor is watching, we appreciate the contribution, which contains a lot of useful information, but would appreciate it if you could help clean it up.

Derrick Coetzee 00:43, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

It is unbelievable, but the introductory one is completely true. It is amazing what this man did to Ivrit. I am immensely surprised there was no this article until now. Shame on you, Jews. I know only two languages literally restored from ashes: Hebrew and Czech. Mikkalai 05:55, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Contradictions in online sources[edit]

Hi everyone. I started writing a biography on Eliezer Ben-Yehuda in French (see Éliézer Ben Yéhouda) and I have found multiple contradictions in the sources I have found in English and French. Unfortunately, I do not read Hebrew, Yiddish, Russian nor German, nor any other language (shame on me!). I should really get at least one book on him, ideally in French, but those I found online were really expensive! Anyway, I am hoping someone can help me clarify things up. Here are the main problems :

Thank you! Merci! -- Mathieugp 00:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Wrong attribution of birth place[edit]

If he was born in Vilna, this is in Lithuania, not in northern Belarus as the text reads. Mountolive | Talk 07:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mountolive. I am happy to speak to someone from Vilna. Do you think it is possible that there are two (or more) towns named Luzhky, one in Lithuania, one in Belarus? All sources I have read say that Eliezer Ben-Yehuda is from Luzhky in Lithuania except for this one:
* http://www.pravapis.org/art_benyehuda2.asp
This person, Uladzimir Katkouski, claims in the footnotes that:
"Here Jack Fellman wrote "Lithuanian village of Luzhky". This is such an unpleasant mistake! I guess that was a surprise to learn this "fact" for any reader who comes from Belarus. It is well-known that Luzhki (Л`ужкі) is a town in northern Belarus, not some obscure "Lithuanian village". So this should've been "Belarusian town of Luzhki".
The reason for this mistake is quite clear though. Belarus and Lithuania share common history, for centuries we lived together in a multiethnical and multiconfessional state, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Vilnia (Vilnius) was truly a Belarusian capital. Now, at the time of Ben-Yehuda's birth Vilnia region and the rest of Belarus was occupied by the Russian Empire and Ben-Yehuda's birth place, the town of Luzhki, according to the Russian administrative division, was a part of "Vilenskaja gubernia" (Vilnia region). It is well-known that Vilnia historically has been a Belarusian capital, but Joseph Stalin gave it to Lithuanians. Still, the town of Luzhki remained a part of Belarus, and never has been a part of modern Lithuanian state. So, whichever way you look at it, saying "Lithuanian village" is wrong.
Over all, this trend makes me very upset. Simon Peres was born and grew up in Belarus (village Vishnia and town of Valozhyn), Ariel Sharon's parents come from Belarus, Ben-Yehuda grew up in Belarus (in Luzhki and Polacak), Etgar Keret's parents come from Belarus (Baranavichy), the first prime minister of Israel comes from Belarus, Marc Chagall grew up and lived in eastern Belarus (Vitebsk), many-many other imminent Jews come from our lands, but somehow this is never acknoweledged by the American writers and researchers, who just say "comes from Russia", showing their "great knowledge" of Eastern European geography and "deep respect" for other cultures! Harvard education does not seem to be of any help either."
Since I am not qualified at all to settle this debate, being from Quebec where we know as much of Eastern Europe as in the rest of North America, I don't know what to do with this. This did not stop me from improving my draft bio of Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, but I would really prefer not to mislead my French readers on his birthplace... :-) -- Mathieugp 16:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, sorry to disappoint you but I am not from anywhere near Lithuania ;)
I am in a similar case as yours: I just ended up in this article by chance and, being no expert, I didn't dare to edit, if I was I would for sure have changed it to Lithuania instead of Northern Belarus.
But this note you bring is actually confusing things more because it turns out to be that he wasn't from Vilna, but from Luzhki (so called northern Belarus town). Then, why on earth it reads that he was born in "Vilna (northern Belarus)": neither he was born in Vilna (apparently he was born in Luzhki) nor Vilna is in Belarus, so... ¿?
It is true that Vilna is very close to the northern Belarus border, so it may well be that, if he was born in Luzhki, that is a peripheral town from Vilna but within Belarus. Still, it is not correct to say that Vilna was a Belarusian city, because it was neither Belarussian nor Lithuanian, but Polish (yes, Eastern Europe was such a mess! :D)
I won't dare to do it myself, because I don't know where he was born, but I guess the safest bet is "Luzhki, nothern Belarus" but what is clear is that the present redaction "Vilna, northern Belarus" is very wrong... Mountolive | Talk 03:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops...I think I understand now: Vilna is mentioned as Vilna Guberniya, not as the city itself. I have made a minor edit which, I think, clarifies the whole thing. Mountolive | Talk 23:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reads with an agenda[edit]

The article reads like a fairy tale with half Charedi zionist downplay and a Reform zionist suck up. None of which decribe Eliezer at all. 203.206.234.139 18:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Quote[edit]

What is the purpose of this quote where it is. “ Before Ben‑Yehuda...Jews could speak Hebrew; after him, they did. ”

-Cecil Roth, Was Hebrew Ever A Dead Language?

AllenHansen (talk) 21:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The quote doesn't actually appear in the article (which also isn't a book). It was falsely cited by historian Jack Fellman and then repeated all over the internet. I added a reference to Jack Fellman and reworded the sentence.

Birth date[edit]

Is the date 7 January 1858 a Julian or Gregorian date? -- JackofOz (talk) 09:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top importance?[edit]

While I agree that Ben Yehuda is very important for WP Israel, I don't think he qualifies as a core Israeli topic, and therefore shouldn't be top-priority on the project. If there are no objections, I will change to high priority. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 22:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cecil Roth quote[edit]

In the "Death and commemoration" section, there is this quote by Cecil Roth stating his opinion of the significance of Ben-Yehuda's legacy:『Before Ben‑Yehuda, Jews could speak Hebrew; after him, they did.』This does not seem to be an accurate or reasonable assessment, and I wonder whether its inclusion in this article is really necessary or constructive: it is hardly objective or non-POV. It utterly fails to recognise that Hebrew was spoken only by a very small number of people and only used for religious purposes – little better than Latin today – and it has since become a national language spoken by millions for everyday conversation and is the official language of Israel. To deny that contribution seems to be to pursue some agenda. Does it belong in an encyclopaedia article? (If it does, which I doubt, then certainly the contrary view needs to be included as well.) Richard75 (talk) 14:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reconsidered this as I think I misinterpreted what Roth meant. This article clarifies what Roth meant: before Ben Yehuda Jews could speak Hebrew, but mostly didn't; after him, they spoke it all the time — "could" compared with "did." I have clarified this in the article. Richard75 (talk) 18:11, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eliezer_Ben-Yehuda&oldid=1222591891"

Categories: 
C-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in People
C-Class level-5 vital articles
Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
C-Class vital articles in People
C-Class Belarus articles
Low-importance Belarus articles
C-Class Judaism articles
Mid-importance Judaism articles
C-Class biography articles
C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
Science and academia work group articles
WikiProject Biography articles
C-Class Israel-related articles
High-importance Israel-related articles
WikiProject Israel articles
Selected anniversaries (January 2019)
Hidden categories: 
Noindexed pages
Selected anniversaries articles
 



This page was last edited on 6 May 2024, at 20:23 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki