Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 How better to present these dates?  
2 comments  













Talk:Emperor Kōkō




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


How better to present these dates?[edit]

In the Kugyō section:

.................................................... lifetime, 836-891
... time in office (884-887)
.......... Kampaku (884-887), Fujiwara no Mototsune (藤原基経), 884-887
  1. ^ Brown, Delmer. (1979). Gukanshō, p. 289.
  • ^ Brown, p. 289.
  • In the intial edit, I intended to present the dates during which someone held a specific court title, but that now seems too ambitious for a start-level article. The intention had been to explain the sequence of serial officeholders with these dates.

    Instead, it's probably better to simply list the birth/death dates. Arguably, it might be possible (or even preferable) to include both sets of dates as the information becomes available ...? --Ooperhoofd 19:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    I think the terms of office is more important than the birth/death dates. Most Japanese references show only their terms. But, to present both date is possible, and from both dates I think we can get the other information (retirement, the reason of resignation, etc.). To show both dates, for example,
    * Kampaku, Fujiwara no Mototsune (藤原基経) (836-891), 884-887
    or,
    * Kampaku 884-887, Fujiwara no Mototsune (藤原基経) (836-891)
    Usually dates in parenthesis after their names are recognized their birth/death dates. We may need to consider where the terms of office are put in.
    It's good to show the kugyo in the emperor's era. Especially, in Heian period, most kugyo were the relatives of the emperor and/or their wives, so, the information is very useful. After Kamakura period, it may be difficult to show all Dainagons and to identify them. After the period kugyo had little influence and many sub-Dainagons(? vice-Dainagons?)(権大納言, Gon-no-dainagon) existed. Mmmm, I should study (define?) how to express government posts and historical terms correctly in English...--Pentiles 12:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Emperor_Kōkō&oldid=1203179775"

    Categories: 
    Start-Class Japan-related articles
    Mid-importance Japan-related articles
    WikiProject Japan articles
    Start-Class biography articles
    Start-Class biography (royalty) articles
    Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
    Royalty work group articles
    WikiProject Biography articles
    Hidden category: 
    Noindexed pages
     



    This page was last edited on 4 February 2024, at 09:58 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki