This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 01:40, July 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
The Imperial mon (emblem) was added in the Notes section in 2010. In 2012, the image was removed from this and other articles about Japanese emperors -- compare here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era
The use of this symbol is justified because this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō): 崇神天皇 (10). Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 15:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Emperor Sujin/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Dr. Stephen Turnbull in his 1982 book (Book of the Samurai: Warrior class of Japan) places Sujin at 200 C.E., not 97 B.C.
Last edited at 00:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC).
Substituted at 14:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
In the "Legendary narrative" section in the second paragraph the following sentence appears:
"Sujin is regarded by historians as a "legendary emperor" and the paucity of material information about him makes difficult any further verification and study."
Why the use of such a rare word, what is the significance of using it instead of "scarcity"?
If there is no actual significance I suggest changing it to make the text more readable.
62.219.123.172 (talk) 09:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
