 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This redirect is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
HiMercury McKinnon, you work for GMA Network, right? I noticed that this article was copied in verbatim by the iGMA.tv site.[1] I think that iGMA.tv should indicate that this article is released under GNU Free Documentation License. To the administrators, please do not delete this because it is the original text. iGMA.tv just copied it from here. This article was first written in the Encantadia article and was separated when that article grew. --Jojit fb 05:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ii suggest that this should be observed in this article so that it will be easily understood. --Sang'gre Danaya's baby 07:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hasne Ivo Live-Maligayang kaarawan Maste Lesnu Encantadia-Kapayapaan para sa Encantadia Ecta septu-Maghanda kayo Agtu-Sugod
Sang'gre Danaya (talk) 01:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I removed the Hade lyrics all over again because of the following reasons: 1. Hade was recorded in 2006 for the TV show Encantadia. Therefore, since 2006, the copyright owner of the song is GMA Network (which holds the royalty for Encantadia series) as well as the composer itself. 2. According to Wikipedia:LYRICS#Copyright-expired_works, generally, copyrights are expired if the song was published before January 1, 1923 (or at least 95 years before the current year). If we'll take this as a basis, for Hade to be exempted from copyright, this must be published about 87 years ago (for the 1923) or 1915 the latest (which is 95 years ago). Either case, Hade does not qualify because it was only published about 3 years ago. 3. Okay, so I don't know if the composer's identity was disclosed by GMA but the two things are true if it was disclosed or not:
So, in any of the case above, posting Hade lyrics is an absolute copyright violation from the copyrights of the composer and the song of the owner. Even though it is an excerpt (which is unlikely except that you only add ellipsis), then it is still under copyright. I suggest you to mention only the nature of the song.
To have a linguistic example for the language, you must build example. Do not use the copyrighted song as an example.--JL 09 q?c 16:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To the anonymous user(s) who keep(s) adding huge sections with vocabulary and sample texts: as I already explained twice in the edit summary, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection of all information available about a subject. This article is supposed to be about Enchanta, i.e. what it is, who made it, what it is used for, how it works, etc. It is not intended to serve as a manual for potential users of the language. A short fragment (one or a few sentences) to give the reader an idea of the language is fine, but an entire conversations guide is out of the question. Likewise, a section about vocabulary should discuss what words are based on, how they are formed and the like, and give a few relevant examples, but it should definitely not contain an entire dictionary. Remember: Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal. That type of information belongs in a book or on a website, which can then be linked to in the External links or References section. Alternatively, you might consider using Wikibooks for it. Please consider, however, that you cannot simply copy information from a website or another wiki, because that would be copyright infringement.
Let me also remind you that Edit warring is not allowed here. I you believe that the disputed information is necessary for the quality of the article and not in violation of policies, you should use this talk page here to demonstrate that with arguments. Repeatedly undoing other people's edits is not the way. Thanks. —IJzeren Jan Uszkiełtu? 08:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. If you want to improve the article, there are plenty of other things that need work. First of all, the article is poorly sourced. Both news articles cannot be retrieved and appear to be about the show rather than about the language. On the other hand, statements like "The source material of the language appears to have been derived from Philippine languages (particularly Tagalog) and Romance languages" and "It has its own script, Enchan, which appears to be based on Baybayin" really require references. In addition, the article gives practically no information about the language itself: zero info about phonology, orthography, grammar etc., and it is not even made clear whether Enchanta has any of these things at all. For all I can see, it might as well a matter of randomly picked words and sounds. Even for the sample sentences I cannot find a single source, at least on the Internet. That's another reason why I removed the vocabulary list, the numbers and the remaining samples sentences: the only places where these things can be found are somebody's Facebook pages and a wiki. Neither are reliable sources. —IJzeren Jan Uszkiełtu? 11:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.P.S. Aha, and another thing is that the article currently doesn't even make it clear what the name of the language is, EnchantaorEnchan. —IJzeren Jan Uszkiełtu? 11:34, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Enchanta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
