| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Energy harvesting article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference 16 does not say anything about piezo energy harvesting has been investigated only since the late 1990s, it is only an example of research and is therefore not the correct citation for this fact. It should be changed.
White, N.M., Glynne-Jones, P. and Beeby, S.P. (2001) A novel thick-film piezoelectric micro-generator. Smart Materials and Structures, 10, (4), 850-852. (doi:10.1088/0964-1726/10/4/403). Ghoople (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article was written by someone who doesn't use English as their first language, or a complete moron. It needs a complete clean-up. It really is bad!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.68.7 (talk) 19:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Max Donalson already has a working prototype to strap on the knee. perhaps it can be included
The electricity generating shoes + energy storage backpack could also be included see http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6982497.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.182.169.117 (talk) 18:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Energy harvesting → Human energy harvesting — To refer to energy harvesting of human power, perhaps the term human energy harvesting is more appropriate
Be very careful about claims made for this product. It is not clear that it can do what is claimed by the manufacturer, that is re-charge a Blackberry battery in about 90 minutes using energy from WiFi hotspots, as per the video taken at the CES show in this link: http://www.ohgizmo.com/2010/01/09/ces2010-rca-airnergy-charger-harvests-electricity-from-wifi/ Also see the follow-up comments in this link, as well as in the link cited in the article. It would appear that new laws of physics would be the bigger story if this device performs as billed. I have inserted somewhat cautionary text. Cheers, Psarj (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You'd think that the fact that there is no company called RCA would be a dead giveaway that this is a hoax, even for those who have no understanding of the real world.
Really? You've never heard of [Radio Corporation of America|RCA]? Did a quick search, guess this gizmo never made it to market in any case. TANSTAAFL (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"In practice, for energy scavenging devices for wearable electronics, most devices generate just a few milliwatts of power.[1]{Contradiction-inline|reason=With „a few µW/cm³“ (prior paragraph), generating a „a few milliwatts“ would require devices the size of several 1000 cm³ (=several litres)|date=November 2009}" (Posted by another editor). I've Googled the different terms in the cited source, and while a January 08 article for Vermeulen shows up along with NatuurWetenschap & Techniek, the article I found does not support the energy scavenging text. I've tagged the paragraph verify source, but perhaps the best thing to do is simply delete this rather obscure entry. But I'm not a technical expert, so some other editor should decide. --S. Rich (talk) 08:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
References
In the Photovoltaic harvesting section, the explanation of DSSC working principle is wrong and the sentence doesn't even make sense in terms of syntax! To be addressed asap please! Lore Rove (talk) 11:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Energy can be achieved from environment in many ways, but we always prefer when we utilize no any source and get energy freely. This fact is actually well adopted and related to Smart roadsorpiezoelectric roads in which electricity is produced from the motion of vehicle on the road. So i have added such type of thread in this article as it will surely improve the concept of energy harvesting Nechlison (talk) 21:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems to include a lot of useful information. However, I get the impression that some people just add their own research to some sections intending to promote themselves. This leads to obviously wrong information. Just one example:
Arman Hajati and Sang-Gook Kim invented the Ultra Wide-Bandwidth micro-scale piezoelectric energy harvesting device by exploiting the nonlinear stiffness of a doubly clamped microelectromechanical systems (MEMSs) resonator. The stretching strain in a doubly clamped beam shows a nonlinear stiffness, which provides a passive feedback and results in amplitude-stiffened Duffing mode resonance.
This is obviously wrong. Anyone working in the field of nonlinear energy harvesting knows, that there has been a lot of research in this field long before the cited reference from 2011. Stanton, Ramlan, Cottone and may others have conducted research in the field of nonlinear devices since at least 2008. They included not only piezoelectric conversion, but also electromagnetic conversion.
There are a lot more "suspicious" citations of this kind. Consequently, I suggest that this article is completely reviewed! --77.2.13.97 (talk) 09:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps that we should mention the use of NoXCoO2 to improve the efficiency of thermal energy scavengers ? See http://www.utwente.nl/mesaplus/archive/2014/3/343410/thermoelectric-materials-can-be-much-more-efficient KVDP (talk) 15:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Energy harvesting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In this part energy harvesting by means of a ferromagnetic fluid is mentioned but the results are falsely presented, citing: "to harvest low frequency vibrational energy at 2.2 Hz with a power output of ~80 mW per g.[66]"
I just downloaded the cited article and there is no mention of a 2.2 Hz or 80mW/g, in fact the power is mentioned in the microwatt range. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Blažević (talk • contribs) 11:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
