Contents

Talk:European Court of Justice

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the European Court of Justice article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

European Union Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations: Law Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as High-importance).

"The principle of direct effect would have had little impact if Union law did not supersede national law. Without supremacy the Member States could simply ignore EU rules. In Costa v ENEL (1964), the court ruled that member states had definitively transferred sovereign rights to the Community and Union law could not be overridden by domestic law." I was wondering whether we should avoid the anachronism here and, instead of Union law (or EU law), use Community law (or EC law). Is there any settled practice or guideline on this? Gitz (talk) (contribs) 00:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Palais de la Cour de Justice CJEU March 2023 Sign, Towers C,B and A and the Anneau buiding.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The division map seems to be a reused svg showing EU countries, this is no longer accurate, as it excludes Northern Ireland along with the rest of the UK.

Northern Ireland should still be colored blue, as the ECJ still has jurisdiction. 109.78.91.206 (talk) 01:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]