Contents

Talk:Extreme Engineering

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 June 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletionbyDonaldd23 (talk · contribs) on 10 March 2024.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I added a column for premiere dates over the past day. The dates at the Discovery.com website and epguides.com are consistent for Season 4. Dates at epguids.com for Seasons 1 and 5 look ok also. There are a number of doubtful dates for Seasons 2 and 3. These are all marked with (?). If there is a date before the (?), a typo has been corrected, but we have no other documentation.

The Big Dig article sounds like that project is completed rather under construction. --Abdull 18:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The project is complete, but as the column head says "Status at the time of series production", it was under construction when the series was filmed. Fosnez 18:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a column to that table for 'Current Status' of the projects but I could use some help filling it out. - Siddharth Prabhu 07:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That column is gone. I could help filling out, but not if it will be removed again. jax (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The project displayed in "Subways in America" is NOT a project of MTA New York City Transit and has little to do with the city subway. The project is East Side Access, a plan to bring a sister MTA operation, The Long Island Railroad into a new terminal under Grand Central Terminal. It's only connection to the subway is that it will use the lower level of the 63rd street tunnel. Also, construction has already begun, and in a few places it's finished, on various parts of the project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Having just rewatched it, there are actually several projects discussed in this, some ongoing, some proposed, and some completed at the time of showing:

• History of how the NY subway was built
• BART's immersed tunnel under the bay
• Repairing the damage to the NY subway following 9/11
• New efforts to improve the maintenance of the NY subway
• Addition of GPS and laser range detection to NY subway trains in order to decrease the minimum distance between them
• New terminal and East River tunnel (as mentioned by the unsigned commenter above)
• A brief mention of another new station which I think is a reference to the South Ferry Subway Station that is discussed in more detail in a later show.

How to summarise this in the table format, I'll leave to editors more skilled than myself. :) JulesH (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the pilot, the drifting/out-of-control ship is named "Weylan Yutani." Presumably, the person who programmed the vessel is a fan of the Aliens movies... dafydd (talk) 00:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My thought is that maybe this article should be retitled "Build It Bigger". I realize that this article is read both by British and Americans. The show in America is called Build It Bigger, but in the UK it is Extreme Engineering. I realize that we shouldn't be completely selfish and say because we're Americans it should be our name. However the show is filmed with an American host and as far as I know Discovery started as an American TV Network. So my thinking is that this should be changed to Build It Bigger and redirected from Extreme Enginnereing. Any other thoughts? (RC43 (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

• Well, with other outside sources mainly referring to it as Extreme Engineering, I'd say we should stick with that title. Netflix, for example, has all of the episodes listed under that title, and since it was an American company, that should be some significance. Not to mention Extreme Engineering is a better title, it is less arrogant and more catchy, "Build It Bigger" seems like it could just be a show about cars or stadiums, or any of the other cliche structures we tend to go overboard in building... However, there could be a link to the page from looking up Build It Bigger, although there may already be one. Ziggaway (talk) 10:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've come across references to a show titled "Colossal Construction" showing on Discovery Science with an episode list that sounds suspiciously similar to Extreme Engineering's. Is this another renaming? JulesH (talk) 14:00, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The lede includes the claim "The show has been hosted by Danny Forster since season 4". Is this actually correct? He's in season 4 and season 6 onwards but of the season 5 episodes that I've seen, he's not present in any of them. --AussieLegend (talk) 11:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recall him being in the stonecutters bridge episode.--Cygnusloop99 (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are two episodes featuring that bridge, one in season 5 and one in season 7. He's in the season 7 episode but not season 5. --AussieLegend (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've managed to chase down 5 of the 6 season 5 episodes and he's not in any of them. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Give us a source for this. I don't think there will be two more episodes added. Normally, all is aired within a few weeks, no long breaks between episodes.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.62.90.129 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extreme Engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206112719/http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/engineering/engineering.htmltohttp://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/engineering/engineering.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extreme Engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061022082043/http://shopping.discovery.com/product-41853.html?rel_productId=59639tohttp://shopping.discovery.com/product-41853.html?rel_productId=59639

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]