This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Why do we have a revert war on this? On the premise that it's better to include more information than less, I'm reverting to the version where it's included, but if someone can explain why it should be otherwise, I'll gladly change my mind. --Leifern11:23, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's to prominent. If one reads lots of ü-articles it is annoying. Everybody can copy paste the ü in the adress bar and see what an ü is and how it is treated. The premise is NOT to provide less important info in the first line. Tobias Conradi(Talk)16:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 3 external links on Fürth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The article about Fürth says „By 1840, there were 2535 Jews living in Fürth, more than half of all Bavarian Jews“. The first part of the statement is correct whereas the second part is completely wrong. In 1818, there were 42.738 Jews in Bavaria and in 1867 36.798. The number of Jews in Fürth was always much less than 10%. In 1818, 81.3% of the Bavarian Jews lived in Franconia, only 3.5% in Upper Bavaria, Lower Bavaria and Oberpfalz. The remaining 15.2% in Swabia. So there were almost no Jews in what was traditionally Bavaria.
Anyway, the sentence should be corrected in a way to point out that Fürth was by far the most numerous Jewish community in Bavaria. TXDegnaisch (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
