Contents

Talk:F2FS

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Removed old comments dating back as far as 2012. F2FS has matured and is in productive use. There is no question as to its notability or relevance.

Here is a 2019 article "Evaluating File System Reliability on Solid State Drives", which appears to be a quality source about F2FS which could be added to the article. --Roman Riabenko (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any info or statistics on what it's intended to improve on, and how well that works? Like does it wear out the Flash at a slower rate than EXT4 for instance? — Omegatron (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found this dude who did quite a few benchmarks on linux-5.0 (so not too recent, but not too old either). Maybe you could summarize and include it in the article. In general, I cannot find much. --Leo Navis (talk) 16:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]