Fairfax Media is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
The older article should be updated and moved to this name (to preserve long edit history). This article should be moved out of the way first, then merged with the other article. --Scott DavisTalk 08:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Performed Full-content paste merger, but long page history was not preserved. Why?--143.238.33.118 06:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We need some new logos for the Fairfax radio stations we should keep the old ones as historical reference, We need new logos for i.e. 3AW, 4BC etc
They need to be compliant with Wikipedia logo usage policies, and should be placed on the appropriate articles as Southern Cross broadcasting is no longer
Adrian90 (talk) 11:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't looked at WP:LEDE yet (I'm on a very slow connection, please forgive me.) but I found it odd that there was "current news" in the initial paragraph. I'd be inclined (presuming that my memory of the guideline is correct, and probably even if it's not) to move that material down. Comments urging caution? - Aaron Brenneman (talk) 00:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Fairfax Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 5 external links on Fairfax Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moot. Nominator moved the pagetoFairfax Media before the move discussion was closed, and they are the only participant in this move discussion, which is almost the equivalent of withdrawing the original request. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 23:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nine Publishing → John Fairfax Holdings – The article is largely about the historical John Fairfax Holdings rather than Nine Publishing. Nine Publishing is more of a successor to Fairfax subsidiary Australian Metro Publishing, excluding other subsidiaries such as Australian Community Media and Stuff, which Nine has signaled it is intending to sell. The company was know as John Fairfax Holdings for longer than it was known as Fairfax Media and the retrospective article should be known as such. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 02:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.King of♥♦♣ ♠ 18:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
While I originally took the perspective that Nine Publishing was the successor to Fairfax Media, I have since been convinced that this is not the case. The assets that comprise that are much more consistent with former Fairfax subsidiary Australian Metro Publishing (previously Australian Publishing Media). The Nine Publishing website does not list any former Fairfax assets as publications except those run by AMP. Nine has signalled its intentions to sell off other Fairfax assets including its events arm and NZ subsidiary Stuff. As such, I am of the view that any claim that Fairfax Media has been succeeded by Nine Publishing should be removed. --DilatoryRevolution (talk) 12:13, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nine Publishing is the division that publishes the former Fairfax publications,[2] so is the successor to Fairfax Media. Kenskefield (talk) 02:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone give us more info about the evidence of paid editing? - Chris.sherlock (talk) 09:19, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't see any particular evidence of it, maybe a bit too much self reporting, e.g. the Sydney Morning Herald, Age etc on their parent, but as one of only two national newspaper publishers, would somewhat limit the pool should it be disqualified. Kenskefield (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
