This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose per MarioProtIV. Sure, I would support if a significant event consisting strong tornadoes (above EF4+ rating) however, there were only 4 tornadoes, which, in my opinion, isn't enough. I would be surprised if a tornado struck a major city, say, Demopolis, and that might raise a potential for a move. It did not strike a major city. Per MarioProtIV, the majority of the impacts were on the winter side, I'd say oppose for now. Severestorm2801:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Should we have a tornado table here? i saw this was disputed. It would provide easy access to tornadic information which would otherwise force them to click into a different page and keep it neatly in one page, plus the tornadoes were notable. Plus that’s what we used to do (although this could change and result in us not doing it period, I recognize). i personally think we should, but others have disputed it, so i’ll ask here. It also might be best in its own section.108.170.65.170 (talk) 23:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, there aren't many sources out there depicting road closures in northern Mexico, most Google hits are associated with road closures in northern New Mexico. Should the "Mexico" section be removed entirely? TailsWx18:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.