Contents

Talk:Fig

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Plants High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 29 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Common figtoFig. The result of the discussion was moved.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Ficus#Fig pollination and fig fruit|caprifigs]] The anchor (#Fig pollination and fig fruit) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Common fig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090902145758/http://waynesword.palomar.edu/pljun99b.htmtohttp://waynesword.palomar.edu/pljun99b.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090410033353/http://www.nafex.org/figs.htmtohttp://www.nafex.org/figs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noted now the reverse of my modification from goat to billygoat. I precise first of all that my change is due to a specific reason, and not a joke.

The term "capro" certainly derives from the Latin but it is certainly in current use and has arrived in the English world from Italian, where the term "capro" means exactly the male of the goat. In fact, the goat (female) is written "capra" (final"a").

The meaning, despite the small diversity of the ending, is really huge, as in English the difference between dog and bitch (also in translated meaning). In this case the "capro" represents precisely the masculinity of fertilization, represented in a tree, which, unlike the female, does not produce fruit. The term equivalent to "capro" (male of the goat) has been used in pre-Christian Mediterranean religions as a positive symbol of masculine vigor, and this has been preserved in current Italian culture.

Other uses of the term (frequently in worst sense ..l) have been used for other current or of the past contexts, as also in other sense it is used bitch in English. Please consult: http://www.grandidizionari.it/Dizionario_Italiano/parola/C/capro.aspx?query=capro http://dictionaries.corriere.it/damico_italiano/C/capro.shtml

It: Scalin2 Scarlin2 (talk) 08:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fig which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

various percentages regarding largest producers; also various tonnages; where to find annual world wide raw data? link to 'world cartel' of producers?

Howard from NYC (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbishop: I still can't see a significant claim of ornamental use in #Modern section. Even if there is some ornamental use (yeah, it's evergreen and is kind of nice plant to have in your backyard; but I haven't seen it sold in decorative plant nurseries like several of its Ficus relatives), I think it's quite marginal compared to its economic importance as foodstuff. Therefore, it's undue to mention in the lead paragraph per MOS:LEADREL, and I'm still inclined to remove it as a minor aspect. Do you agree? No such user (talk) No such user (talk) 12:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind this aspect being removed the lead, I agree it isn't a significant use for the plant compared with its culinary one. Sbishop (talk) 13:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]