This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no>
| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no>
| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no>
| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no>
| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no>
assessing the article against each criterion.
In my understanding, the divertion of FLIGHT INSPECTION to FLIGHT TEST is a mistake.
If you read carefully, all FLIGHT TEST explanations are talking about special flights where aircratf parameters or design are tested, so plains are the objects under test, whereas FLIGHT INSPECTION is a different world (believe me), and part of it are flights where the object under test are the radio navigation aids.
This is the reason why I respectfully ask you for reconsidering this change, leaving FLIGHT INSPECTION page in a separate and independent entry, the way it was designed.
I removed the redirect for the reasons you stated. Having said that, this article needs to have 3rd party references which demonstrate notability and verifiability, or it will probably be deleted speedily. I've left a welcome notice on your talk page with some links to help you. Welcome to Wikipedia ! (As a side note, when you leave a comment you should append 4 tilde marks to make the discussion easier to follow. When you save the page, the system will replace them with your username and timestamp.) Plvekamp (talk) 01:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]