Jump to content

Main menu Navigation ●Main page ●Contents ●Current events ●Random article ●About Wikipedia ●Contact us ●Donate Contribute ●Help ●Learn to edit ●Community portal ●Recent changes ●Upload file

●Create account ●Log in ●Create account ● Log in Pages for logged out editors learn more ●Contributions ●Talk

(Top) 1 Potential sources 2 Criticism 3 Tone

Talk:Force Design 2030

Page contents not supported in other languages. ●Article ●Talk ●Read ●Edit ●Add topic ●View history Tools Actions ●Read ●Edit ●Add topic ●View history General ●What links here ●Related changes ●Upload file ●Special pages ●Permanent link ●Page information ●Get shortened URL ●Download QR code Print/export ●Download as PDF ●Printable version Appearance From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Potential sources[edit]

Some non-USMC sources.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7] I haven't looked in to the reputations for each of these sources, but on quick glance they look reputable, and indicate that there are public concerns and criticisms of the plan that should be addressed in the article.

In addition, there was a special supplement this month to the Marine Corps Gazette, titled "Force Design 2030: The Ongoing Debate", which is available via ProQuest (Wikipedia library). It appears to have some interesting analysis. This is one of the articles in it.^[8]

Schazjmd (talk) 01:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Marletto, Michael P. (November 6, 2022). "Force Design 2030: Transforming to Irrelevance". The National Interest. Retrieved December 6, 2022.

^ "Marine Corps Force Design 2030: Examining the Capabilities and Critiques". Center for Strategic and International Studies. May 9, 2022. Retrieved December 6, 2022.

^ "Marines Update Force Design 2030 After a Year of Experimentation in the Field". USNI News. April 26, 2021. Retrieved December 6, 2022.

^ Means, Other (July 24, 2021). "USMC Force Design 2030: US Marines and the Indo-Pacific". The Diplomat. Retrieved December 6, 2022.

^ Cancian, Mark (June 14, 2022). "Analyzing the biggest changes in the Marine Corps Force Design 2030 update". Breaking Defense. Retrieved December 6, 2022.

^ "MARSOC and Force Design 2030". SOF News. March 27, 2020. Retrieved December 6, 2022.

^ Forsling, Carl (November 25, 2020). "The Commandant of the Marine Corps is charging into the future, but some aren't ready for change". Task & Purpose. Retrieved December 6, 2022.

^ Livingston, James; Vargas, Jay (December 2022). "The Battle of Dai Do and Marine Corps Force Design 2030". Marine Corps Gazette, Special Edition: Force Design 2030 the Ongoing Debate. Vol. 106, no. 12. pp. 111–113. ProQuest 2741038753.

Criticism[edit]

Why is there no “Criticism” section? The decision to remove all tanks seems especially polarising. 197.234.165.147 (talk) 18:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I think about the events in Ukraine, I'd be even more concerned about dumping the gun artillery. Jdougan (talk) 05:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this article reads like an ad for the United States Marines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alacard (talk • contribs) 04:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

This reads like a circlejerk than an actual wikipedia article BarakHussan (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]