 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The reference isn't wrong. A FOE engineer even came forward, anonymously of course, some time ago with details of the Rocam program only an insider would know...including the fact that Rocam is based on Kent. (many of the items he gave to indicate a Kent basis were genuinely just common sense things we should have recognized anyway) Unfortunately this isn't supposed to be enough for Wiki inclusion for obvious reasons, fortunately we have no credible original source stating that this is Zetec or Sigma based either so it apparently has slid by the watchdogs likely because it hasn't been challenged much. (my hat is off to the fella smart enough to include it in the first place) So please, don't rock the boat. This is one of the few automotive issues on Wikipedia which isn't so inaccurate it's laughable. Syr74 (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the bit about the Zetec-Rocam is wrong. Every other page says it's based on the Zetec-SE or Sigma engine, not the Kent/Endura-E. --22:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
These sections of the Ford Kent and Ford Zetec articles are almost identical, so should be merged into one:
Ford_Zetec_engine#Zetec_Rocam_.28duratec_8v.29
Does this need a vote? John a s (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ford Zetec engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
