This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fort Pearson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org
|
A fact from Fort Pearson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 December 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promotedbySL93 (talk) 13:31, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
)
Created by Dumelow (talk) and Ficaia (talk). Nominated by Dumelow (talk) at 21:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @Dumelow and Ficaia: Good article. However, why is there no information on what happened that got rid of the fort. The article says the fort "was" yet there's nothing that says what made it "was" if that makes sense. Rule D7 might make this a problem so I'm going to wait for some expansion here. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]