This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Alas, the Fort townhall website at http://www.fortquappelle.com/hist_pic.html won't identify much less authorise re-use of the several photos it puts online of historical sights of Main Streat amd the long ago east-extreme hotel which burned down several years ago. Would be invaluable additions to the Wikipedia article on the Fort, and it is a vast pity. I remember it well from after-school expeditions down there with parents after rural-school so it's not THAT long ago! Any suggestions on how to engage them and enlist their approval? Masalai (talk) 07:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind: copyright on photos lasts only 50 years in Canada and these photos are much older. And it is easy to find identification of contents. Masalai (talk) 09:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"In 1961, Duane Ring of the Fort Qu'Appelle Sioux Indians was runner up for the hitting crown in 1961 who fell just .057 percentage points...." Not at all clear. Needs fixing as to wording, but not at all clear whether the statement is significant enough for inclusion. Masalai (talk) 18:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]