Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Merger?  
4 comments  




2 Wrong symbol?  
3 comments  




3 Hard to see the difference in the symbols  
3 comments  




4 Spanish examples problematic  
4 comments  




5 Germanic case  
1 comment  




6 Examples from Scottish Gaelic  
1 comment  













Talk:Fortition




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Merger?[edit]

Consonant mutation, Consonant gradation, Spirantization, Lenition, Fortition and Fortis and lenis all seem to be about the same kind of phenomenon. Perhaps they should be merged. FilipeS 21:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I vote for separate articles; together with insertion, deletion, metathesis, assimilation, dissimilation, etc., fortition and deletion form major categories for sound change. --Kjoonlee 19:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Consonant mutation and consonant gradation are important specific cases, and fortis vs lenis is not really the same as forition vs lenition. Spirantization looks like a good candidate for merging into the lenition article, tho. --Tropylium (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merged spirantization. That was a no-brainer. kwami (talk) 06:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong symbol?[edit]

In the table of Gaelic examples, what are the diacritics above g and b? If they are the voicelss diacritic shouldn't they be below the characters?

Marquetry28 (talk) 20:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, on the b. Fixed. On the g, it would interfere with the descender. kwami (talk) 21:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah they need changing [b] > [p] etc. I'll do that. These date back to the time when I used broad phonemic rather than close for Gaelic. Akerbeltz (talk) 23:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to see the difference in the symbols[edit]

"The extremely common approximant sound [j] is sometimes subject to fortition; since it is a semivowel, almost any change to the sound other than simple deletion would constitute fortition. It has changed into the voiced fricative [ʝ]" . Okay, here in this font, [ʝ] and [j] are distinguishable, but in the text they look the same, actually like [i], since the tails almost merge with the left brackets. Is there some way of cleaning this up?Kdammers (talk) 00:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added a few thin spaces. Does this help? --Trɔpʏliʊmblah 15:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some. Kdammers (talk) 12:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish examples problematic[edit]

"The Spanish voiced stops/fricatives b d y g are strengthened to stops [b d ɟʝ ɡ] initially, but also after nasals." This is problematic in two ways. First, what does y represent? It is meant to be /j/? Second, the alternation of [b]~[β] type ([b]ino 'wine', de [β]ino 'of wine') is customarily taken to be a case of weakening (/b/ → [β]), not strengthening (/β/ → [b]). Clarification of y and references for fortition are necessary. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed the statement, feel free to re-add it with a source.--Megaman en m (talk) 16:41, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Based on my knowledge of Spanish, I'm certain that "y" is meant to be /j/, which is often pronounced [ʝ] or [ɟʝ], at least in some dialects (as I've heard speakers do), and often labelled /ʝ/. Also, the sound at the beginning of the Spanish word "vino" /bino/ must be at least somewhat the result of fortition, since this sound was a /w/ in Classical Latin. "B" and "v" are pronounced the same in Spanish, which probably means that the ancestral /b/ underwent lenition in certain environments, and the ancestral /v/ or whatever sound it was underwent fortition in certain environments, i.e., they merged.DubleH (talk) 16:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the distinction between fortition and lenition being diachronic restructuring vs. synchronic allophony. In the case of the initial consonant of vino, /w/ has restructured historically to /b/ (fortition). Ancestral initial /b/ is normally undisturbed historically (e.g. BĔNE > bien). The result is merger of erstwhile initial /w/ and /b/ as /b/, now subject to the synchronic allophonic rule /b/ → [β] (lenition). Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 16:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Germanic case[edit]

Wasn't fortition the case of final devoicement in German for -b; -d; -g endings? <Knab> /knap/; <Berg> /berk/.

Similar to the English strong pasts dreamt, learnt, spelled > spellt? ※ Sobreira ◣◥ ፧ (parlez)⁇﹖ 14:08, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Examples from Scottish Gaelic[edit]

what happened

why is there a reference that just says "t" for examples from scottish gaelic paper2222 (talk) 20:44, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fortition&oldid=1212327883"

Categories: 
Start-Class Linguistics articles
Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
WikiProject Linguistics articles
 



This page was last edited on 7 March 2024, at 08:11 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki