 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Environment stubs on the article page.
|
This sounds more like a publicity stunt by Greenwash Guerrillas than an article. And there are claims with no sources to back them up.
Chuck Coker (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article should be deleted because: 1) It's too short. Like, REALLY short. 2) It doesn't have enough references. Does Fossil Fools day even exist? Who even celebrates it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.234.75.253 (talk) 18:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article provides little information about the recent tradition of Fossil Fools Day. Since this holiday is not only celebrated in the United States, but around the world, it is necessary to dedicate a passage to how citizens in foreign nations have observed this day. On Fossil Fools Day in 2008, hundreds of Australians protested in major cities, such as Melbourne, demanding that policies must be implemented to reverse global warming trends. Rather than simply stating that this holiday is celebrated globally, the article should provide more specificity about how people observe Fossil Fools Day internationally.
In addition, editors must give greater detail to the political platforms that protesters and other observers support or oppose. The article only provides a generalization as to what measures they are advocating without any substantiation. A separate heading should provide details about what legislation or policy proposals that observers are for or against. The article does not even state the organization's purpose. It is crucial to research the motives, such as whether Fossil Fools Day exists to simply provide awareness of environmental issues or create a template for policymakers to reverse environmental degradation. Further detail and substantiation would provide a more expansive and useful article. Ettheman (talk)Ettheman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ettheman (talk • contribs) 19:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fossil Fools Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
