Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 GA Review  
6 comments  


1.1  Checking against GA criteria  







2 External links modified  
1 comment  




3 Ethnic illustration  
1 comment  













Talk:Frances Brundage




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Former good article nomineeFrances Brundage was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frances Brundage/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: fixed one dab.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 09:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: no dead links found. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a(prose): b(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Brundage received her art education from her father, and, at the age of seventeen, was forced to earn a living from her art after Lockwood abandoned his family. Non sequitur, no connection between the two clauses, better as two separate sentences.
    Brundage died on March 28, 1937, aged 82 years. Stand alone sentences are discourage in the WP:MOS.
    Suggest that the lists of publications should be condensed to the more notable. Currently the list content outweighs that of the prose.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a(references): b(citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
    Only one source is used and I am worried about this. What makes it a reliable source?
    I suggest more sources be found. If the subject is notable enough for a Wikipedia article then there should be better sourcing.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a(major aspects): b(focused):
    The article contains little detail of how her work is regarded apart from an opinion on a personal website. In fact the whole is basically just a rewording of that website.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Hard to say without other sources
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b(appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This article desperately needs expansion from other sources than a personal webiste. The lengthy list of publications hould be trimmed. I feel it is not yet of sufficient quality for GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Took care of the prose issues and deleted list of publications until the most notable can be determined through sources. Susanne2009NYC (talk) 18:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Frances Brundage. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic illustration[edit]

The final paragraph of the article on her 'ethnic illustrations' seems mostly personal opinion to me. The harmless depiction of racial stereotypes existing at all, much less in the time this white artist was working, seems difficult to prove. If someone can prove these stereotypical depictions of race were 'positive dramatization', feel free to do so, but I think it's nigh impossible and the entire paragraph should be struck. Plus, the ellipse doesn't suit Wikipedia writing rules at all. This is a weird position for the article to take. Tttttarleton (talk) 18:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Frances_Brundage&oldid=1206460011"

Categories: 
Former good article nominees
B-Class visual arts articles
WikiProject Visual arts articles
B-Class children and young adult literature articles
Low-importance children and young adult literature articles
B-Class biography articles
B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
Arts and entertainment work group articles
WikiProject Biography articles
B-Class Women artists articles
WikiProject Women artists articles
Articles with conflicting quality ratings
Start-Class Women's History articles
Unknown-importance Women's History articles
All WikiProject Women-related pages
WikiProject Women's History articles
Hidden category: 
Noindexed pages
 



This page was last edited on 12 February 2024, at 06:10 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki