This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Many of the sources in this article, to me, seem unreliable. In particular, I note the source for Australia and the source for the United States table. Because of the wide variety of shady information about gambling out there, I think that we should be safe and only allow sources with some legal basis, that is, legislation, court decisions or similar. Before I make this change, however, I have decided to leave this here in case anyone wants to comment. Orthogonal1 (talk) 06:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Orthogonal1: 4 days isn't really an adequate time period for an article which clearly gets very little attention. Whilst I agree with your point, such information is useful to retain on some level, so long as sources are sought. But I have to at least give you credit for making a talk page discussion, as most people don't. I'm honestly surprised your section blanking went unnoticed. I've been reverted almost immediately when section blanking doing maintenance, lol. Uamaol (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Georgia should be included in Asia. Because it is mostly located in Asia and just a little part of it is in Europe. If it can be called a European country then why don't we call Egypt an Asian country? Because it is mostly in Africa and just a little part of it is in Asia.