Contents

Talk:Gaylactic Spectrum Awards

	Gaylactic Spectrum Awards is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
	Gaylactic Spectrum Awards is the main article in the Gaylactic Spectrum Awards series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 25, 2009 Featured list candidate Promoted March 7, 2009 Featured topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured list

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Awards Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Horror Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Part of a serieson
Sex in speculative fiction
General articles Sex and sexuality in SF Gender in SF Women in SF LGBT themes in SF Reproduction in SF
Genres & works Feminist science fiction LGBT themes in horror LGBT themes in mythology LGBT themes in comics Yaoi & Yuri Slash fiction Sexuality in Star Trek Women in comics[disambiguation needed]
Awards & Cons Gaylaxicon convention Gaylactic Network Gaylactic Spectrum Awards ( Novel nominees) ( Short fiction nominees) ( Other work nominees) Lambda Literary Award ( SF nominees) James Tiptree, Jr. Award WisCon Broad Universe
Lists & Categories List of LGBT-themed SF LGBT characters in comics
Tropes Male pregnancy Sex in space Single gender worlds Lesbian vampires Woman Warrior Women in Refrigerators Gynoid
v t e

No disrespect but perhaps clearing GA first may make sense. -- Banjeboi 15:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But GA would fail as having too long an embedded list. If an article passes GA, it is not a list and cannot become a FL (and vice versa). FL was the recomendation of the WP:Awards project.Yobmod (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't realize this was a list instead. -- Banjeboi 16:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No prob, articles on awards have passed both - it depends on if there is enough to write about apart from the winners. The sources for this one are almost all winners anouncements. Compare Lambda Literary Awards, which have had some controversy - that article i'll take to GA.Yobmod (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]