Contents

Talk:George's Day in Spring

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 6, 2008, May 6, 2009, May 6, 2010, and May 6, 2011.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Holidays This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Eastern Orthodoxy This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Serbia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Đurđevdan is not celebrated on May 23 by old calendar, but on April 23. This Serbian religious holiday is also a major holiday for Roma from former Yugoslavia, whether Orthodox or Muslim. Ederlezi in Romani language, this holiday celebrates the return of springtime.

I dont think the article should be merged with St. George's Day, because it is not only the name of the Serbian St. George Day but also a Roma holiday with the same name (with no connection with St. Georges day, accept the date) and a song from the band Bijelo Dugme. Sveti Djordje in Serbia is also NOT a patron saint. Although I think, Djurdjevdan could be mentioned on the St. George Day article. But Djurdjevdan article should remain. Litany

Since it has passed more then 5 days since it was requested to merge this page with St. George's Day and I am the only one to say anything about the raised question. Since I Oppose the mergen I call of the merging. I will although ad an info section on the St. George's Day article about Djurdjevdan. Litany 18:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article need an expansion. It also needs sections for Slavs Djurdjevdan and Roma Djurdjevdan. If somebody want to contribute I would be very happy but I will do my best with finding information and add to this article. Litany 18:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added a part of the Gorani tradition of the holiday. Litany 18:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Đurđevdan ... a Serbian religious holiday, celebrated on April 23 by the Julian calendar, or May 6 by Gregorian calendar.

So do some Serbs celebrate on April 23 and some on on May 6? The article doesn't say which date or which calendar is used where. Claret 22:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

23 April Julian and 6 May Gregorian are the very same day, obviously. Duja 12:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Đurđevdan = St George's Day

--Djordjes (talk) 07:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being that there is no『Đ』in the English alphabet, how is this pronounced? Should we start writing articles using 質問をな (Japanese) and програми (Russian) as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.69.81.2 (talk) 14:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

== I couldn't agree with you more. This is getting completely out of hand and one of the main issues that will forever keep Wikipedia (the English version, at least) from being taken seriously.

-- It is written like that because there is no sound in the English language that makes the exact sound of the Serbian character it is written with, it is saying its like a modified version of a d, close to it, but not quite. Also if you would like to note, the title of the page is not written in Serbian Cyrillic alphabet (which is similar to the Russian you wrote in) so please become a bit more educated before you write. It can be taken as though you are disrespecting Serbian language and the sounds saying 'it is not good enough that we can't read it and pronounce it properly in English, please change your whole language just for my pleasure', also the same with the other languages you quoted. I can see what you were trying to say, but this articles title is written in the English alphabet, with modified letters for modified sounds, and if you really want to know how to say it that bad you could try learning the Serbian alphabet (its not too difficult) or even just find it in Cyrillic and type it into translate and listen to how it is said. I find what you said unreasonable and slightly offensive. Its not that big of a deal, but disrespecting other languages for your own benefit it. P.S. How is Wikipedia going to be taken less seriously because it is being authentic?? Honestly some things that come out of peoples mouths confuse me sometimes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.175.150 (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both Ð and ð are used in Old English and early Middle English and have the sound of th as in either think (voiceless) or that (voiced). See eth for more information. In modern usage it is found in Icelandic and Faroese. Welsh words which formally used it now use a double d as in Gwynedd pronounced "Gwineth". In 1878 Đuro Daničić took the Icelandic eth and employed it for his Serbo-Croatian dictionary to replace older the digraphs dj and gj. It was officially adopted in 1892. It is important to realise therefore that Đurđevdan is NOT pronounced "Thurthevdan" as it would be in English, but Djurdjevdan which is its official transcription. This is just one part of a much larger debate as to how much the English language should be modified to suite foreign languages. We still talk of Munich (not München) or Moscow (not Moskva) and yet now are expected to use Mumbai and Beijing in place of Bombay and Peking. Ultimately my feeling here is the WP:RF must always apply and using the English transcription would be courteous to Anglophones, some of whom may be speaking English as a poor second language. Pehaps the article title should be Djurdjevdan and Đurđevdan created as a redirect (move does this automatically), but then the first sentence ought to read "Djurdjevdan (Sebian Đurđevdan) (Ђурђевдан, pronounced [ˈdʑuːrdʑeʋdaːn], "George's day" in Serbian, Gergyovden "George's day" in Bulgarian, Jurjevo "George's" in Croatian and Bosnian or Gjurgjuvden (Ѓурѓовден) in Macedonian, is a South-Slavic religious holiday, celebrated on April 23 by the Julian calendar (May 6 by Gregorian calendar), which is the feast of Saint George and a very important Slav". Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Đurđevdan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070203232359/http://www.dijaspora.ch:80/sr/main/crkva/sveci/djurdjevdantohttp://www.dijaspora.ch/sr/main/crkva/sveci/djurdjevdan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Đurđevdan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080529123741/http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/SEEFA/Vol_IX_No_2_2004_page57.pdftohttp://www.arts.ualberta.ca/SEEFA/Vol_IX_No_2_2004_page57.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re the merge tag of February 2018: I suggest the merge be with George's Day in Autumn, since both appear to be observed by the Serbian Church, it's less generic than "Saint George's Day", and they seem to complement each other. Mannanan51 (talk) 13:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose both the initial proposal and the alternative. The initial proposal isn't necessaty because there is an appropriate Summary/main link between Saint George's Day#South Slavic tradition and Balkan spring festival and Đurđevdan. The second proposal doesn't work as April isn't in Autumn in the parts of the world that mostly celebrate this, and it comes from a quite different tradition, as the Saint George's Day#Eastern Orthodox tradition section discusses. Klbrain (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]