Contents

Talk:Gian Carlo Wick

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gian Carlo Wick article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Physics: Biographies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should the name lose the dash? He was Italian, and Italian double names are joined or completely disjoint. --141.108.14.171 (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agreed with the above, and changed the article for a redirect. It is somewhat ambiguous, but rigorously I believe there is no hyphen, see Gian Carlo Wick during the 1930's by Eduardo Amaldi - no hyphen there, and Amaldi would know. I believe the hyphen is to indicate that his first name is "Gian Carlo", rather than "Gian", but that's my guess. Bdushaw (talk) 13:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The National Academy of Sciences uses the hyphen. Johnbod (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the name is better without the hyphen. One can find plenty of references to "Gian-Carlo" and references to "Gian Carlo". Most of the papers by him do not indicate he used a hyphen, and I noted the biography by Eduardo Amaldi "Gian Carlo Wick during the 1930s" is without the hyphen (20th Century Physics: Essays and Recollections : a Selection of Historical ...). Amaldi and Wick were co-workers so Amaldi would know. I suspect the hyphen was to indicate that his first name was "Gian Carlo" rather than "Gian", as some might read it. Bdushaw (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the NAS citation. There are valid, and strong, citations either way. But I don't believe Wick used the hyphen in his own publications, and his close associates also did not use the hyphen. As I say, I believe the hyphen was to indicate to readers that calling him "Gian" was not correct, its "Gian Carlo"; his middle name was not Carlo. The NY Times obituary does not use a hyphen, nor does the biography of Wick by his friend and colleague, E. Amaldi. My own view is to change the article title to not have the hyphen, and note in the text that he was "Gian Carlo". Sans hyphen is more authentic. Bdushaw (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]